MedTrace Logo

Imaging for SIJ Injection Therapy

NCT03992053 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2021-05-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The Research question: Among two standard image guidance techniques \[2-dimension (2-D) conventional Fluoroscopy Versus 3-dimension (3-D) Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)\], which is the better guidance for Sacroiliac Joint Injection therapy and should be used first?

The specific aims: To detect the difference of the first-time success rate, the cross-over rate, the procedural time, the radiation exposure, the incidence of adverse events/complications, and overall satisfaction score between the 2-D Fluoroscopy versus 3-D CBCT guidance for SIJ injection.

Conditions

  • Sacroiliitis
  • Sacroiliac Joint Pain

Interventions

OTHER

sacroiliac joint injection

Image-guided sacroiliac joint injection under fluoroscopy or CT guidance and the success of intraarticular access was demonstrated by inter-articular contrast spread (the standard of care, not part of study intervention).

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Jiang Wu, MD · University of Washington

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-05-31
Primary Completion
2021-04-07
Completion
2021-04-07

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Companies

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03992053 on ClinicalTrials.gov