The Value of IVL Compared To OPN Non-Compliant Balloons for Treatment of RefractorY Coronary Lesions (VICTORY) Trial
NCT05346068 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 280
Last updated 2024-06-18
Summary
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has become the dominant treatment strategy for patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring revascularization. Nonetheless, PCI with stent implantation has some limitations and especially patients with severely calcified coronary lesions (approximately 10-20% of all patients with CAD) have an elevated risk for adverse outcomes, including target lesion failure (TLF) and stent thrombosis (ST).
Several dedicated PCI devices have been developed for treatment of severely calcified lesions. Whereas especially two of them have shown promising results in smaller, prospective studies. First, the super high-pressure NC PCI balloon (OPN™ NC, SIS Medical AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland) has been shown to represent an effective and safe device for lesion preparation. Second, the lately introduced Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)™ balloon catheter (Shockwave Medical, Santa Clara, CA, USA) appears to be a safe and efficient alternative device for treatment of calcified coronary lesions. However, it remains unknown, if the OPN™ NC balloon is non-inferior to to IVL regarding lesion preparation and completeness of stent expansion in severely calcified lesions.
Conditions
- Coronary Disease
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Calcific Coronary Arteriosclerosis
- Stent Restenosis
- Coronary Artery Calcification
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
OPN™ NCB Super High Pressure PCI Balloon
In order to permit advancement of the studied medical devices - OPN™ NCB or Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter - initial lesion preparation using small SCBs or NCBs (≤2mm) or rotablation (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, United States) is allowed, but will be documented. This may be required in selected cases with very calcified and tight lesions. As per protocol, lesion preparation will be performed using either the super-high pressure PCI balloon OPN™ NCB or the Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter according to random treatment assignment after matching the angiographic and/or OCT inclusion criteria. Following successful lesion preparation all patients will be treated with a latest generation durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Xience™ Sierra or Skypoint, Abbott Vascular Inc., Santa Clara, CA, United States) to allow comparison of stent expansion.
- DEVICE
-
Shockwave™ C2 IVL Catheter
In order to permit advancement of the studied medical devices - OPN™ NCB or Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter - initial lesion preparation using small SCBs or NCBs (≤2mm) or rotablation (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, United States) is allowed, but will be documented. This may be required in selected cases with very calcified and tight lesions. As per protocol, lesion preparation will be performed using either the super-high pressure PCI balloon OPN™ NCB or the Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter according to random treatment assignment after matching the angiographic and/or OCT inclusion criteria. Following successful lesion preparation all patients will be treated with a latest generation durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Xience™ Sierra or Skypoint, Abbott Vascular Inc., Santa Clara, CA, United States) to allow comparison of stent expansion.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hôpital Fribourgeois
collaborator OTHER -
Hamilton General Hospital
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Luzerner Kantonsspital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-11-22
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-31
- Completion
- 2028-05-30
Countries
- Switzerland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus-coated Coronary Balloon Dilatation Catheter for Coronary Small Vessels
NCT06345209 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sirolimus-Coated Balloon Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis
NCT04240444 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Paclitaxel Releasing Balloon in Patients Presenting With In-Stent Restenosis
NCT00961181 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis
NCT01735825 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffold vs. Drug Coated Balloon for Treatment Of In-Stent-Restenosis
NCT03529006 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility Study With the Sirolimus-Eluting BX Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Diabetic Patients With Native Coronary Artery Lesions
NCT00489164 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
RIBS IV (Restenosis Intra-stent of Drug-eluting Stents: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent)
NCT01239940 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The PREVAIL Study
NCT03260517 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A ComparIson of Strategies to PrepAre SeveRely CALCified Coronary Lesions
NCT03487432 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
CVT-ISR First in Human Trial for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis
NCT05731700 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Paclitaxel-releasing Balloon Catheter System Versus the Everolimus-Eluting Stent System for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis Lesions - Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis Lesions (The HOST-ISR Trial) -
NCT01093300 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Trial to Assess Non-inferiority of an Orbital Atherectomy Only Versus a Calcium-tailored Debulking Approach
NCT07105930 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Paclitaxel-coated or Uncoated AngioSculpt Scoring Balloon Catheter
NCT01495533 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Reservoir-Based Polymer-Free Amphilimus-Eluting Stent Versus Polymer-Based Everolimus-Eluting Stent in Diabetic Patients
NCT01710748 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon Versus Drug Eluting Stent in Native Coronary Artery Stenoses of Diabetic Patients
NCT00462631 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
The Study of the BX Velocity Stent in the Treatment of De Novo Artery Lesions.
NCT00381420 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Initial Double-Blind Drug-Eluting Stent vs Bare-Metal Stent Study.
NCT00233805 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Drug-Coated Balloon Coronary Angioplasty Versus Stenting for Treatment of Disease Adjacent to a Chronic Total Occlusion.
NCT04881812 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laser-excimer Versus High-pressure Dilation to Treat Under-expansion of the Stent
NCT04359446 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sirolimus-coated Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent in Native Coronary Vessels - TRANSFORM II
NCT04893291 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs. Intravascular Brachytherapy in In-Stent Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions(SISR)
NCT00231257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Treatment of Coronary In-stent Restenosis (ISR) by a Sirolimus Coated or a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon
NCT03242096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons Against Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Elective PCI Using OCT
NCT02607241 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
PEPCAD I. The Paclitaxel-Eluting PTCA-Balloon Catheter to Treat Small Vessel
NCT00404144 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Stenting With or Without Coating Compared With Angioplasty in Non-benestent Disease
NCT00192881 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA