Optimizing Graft Selection for ACL Reconstruction
NCT05342441 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150
Last updated 2025-08-28
Summary
Purpose:
To investigate the differences between the three most common methods for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), to support the development of the best method for the individual patient.
Main research area: ¨ Sports Orthopedic Surgical research.
State of the art:
Every year in Denmark 2500 patients receive surgical reconstruction surgery to replace a ruptured ACL. Many patients experience a decline in knee function and 4-12% suffer a new ACL rupture within 5 years. According to data from the Danish ACL register, three methods of reconstruction are most prevalent, but with large variation between hospitals. This indicates lack of consensus on optimal surgical procedure.
Design:
Assessor-blinded randomized controlled study. 150 patients aged 18-40 with ruptured ACL are allocated to reconstruction with tendon(s) harvested from either the semitendinosus and gracilis, or the patella tendon, or the quadriceps tendon. Patient follow-up will be conducted preoperatively and 1, 6, 12, 24 months postoperatively.
Primary technologies and outcomes:
* Patient-reported knee-joint function, quality of life and donor-site morbidity is obtained with standardized questionnaires. Primary outcome is subjective knee function with the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation form (IKDC)
* Instrumented analysis of knee-joint coordination and neuromuscular control including 3-D motion capture and electromyography (EMG) during single leg jumps, landings and change-of-direction. Measurement of maximal explosive muscle power in knee extension and flexion. Primary outcome is relative difference between injured and healthy leg in rate of force development (RFD-LSI).
* Standard clinical knee examination of range of motion and instrumented examination of knee-joint stability.
* Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the thigh muscles for examination of muscle morphology.
The trial is designed for publication in three primary publications
1. \- Patient reported effect of graft choice in ACL reconstruction
2. \- Biomechanical effect of graft choice in ACL reconstruction
3. \- Clinical effect of graft choice in ACL reconstruction
Additional secondary publications are in the pipeline. Reference to primary protocol and results will always be emphasized in secondary publication to ensure methodological transparency.
Conditions
- ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
QT graft
Surgical reconstruction of primary ACL rupture with autograft harvested from the quadriceps tendon without bone block. The QT graft is harvested through a 4-5 cm incision at the upper pole of the patella. A graft sized 10-12 mm in with and app. 6 mm in depth is harvested from the middle part of the tendon. The femoral tunnel is placed anatomically central in the native footprint of the ACL. The tibia tunnel is also placed anatomically; the center of the tunnel being medially between the eminential spines at the level of the posterior margin of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus. The ST/Gr graft is fixed proximally with the RIGIDFIX® Curve Cross Pin System (DePuy Synthes) and distally with a Milagro skrew (DePuy Synthes) or similar.
- PROCEDURE
-
ST/Gr graft
Surgical reconstruction of primary ACL rupture with autograft harvested from the semitendinosus and gracilis muscles. The ST/Gr graft is harvested through a 4-5 cm incision at the pes anserinus. Both the semitendinosus and the gracilis tendon is identified and harvested. The tendons are prepared and folded to a four-stranded graft with a total diameter of 7-10 mm. The femoral tunnel is placed anatomically central in the native footprint of the ACL. The tibia tunnel is also placed anatomically; the center of the tunnel being medially between the eminential spines at the level of the posterior margin of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus. The ST/Gr graft is fixed proximally with the RIGIDFIX® Curve Cross Pin System (DePuy Synthes) and distally with a Milagro skrew (DePuy Synthes) or similar.
- PROCEDURE
-
BPTB graft
Surgical reconstruction of primary ACL rupture with autograft harvested from the patella tendon with bone block (bone-patellar-tendon-bone). The BPTB graft is harvested through two 4-5 cm incisions, one on the tibial tuberosity and one on the patella. The middle 10 mm of the patella tendon plus 20-30 mm bone plugs at each end from corresponding tibia and patella is harvested. The femoral tunnel is placed anatomically central in the native footprint of the ACL. The tibia tunnel is also placed anatomically; the center of the tunnel being medially between the eminential spines at the level of the posterior margin of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus. The BPTB graft is fixed both proximally and distally with a Milagro skrew (DePuy Synthes) or similar.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University College Copenhagen
collaborator OTHER -
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Denmark
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Hvidovre University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Per Hölmich, D.M.Sc/D.Sc · Hvidovre UH
-
Mette K Zebis, MSc, PhD · University College Copenhagen
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-05-09
- Primary Completion
- 2026-05-31
- Completion
- 2028-05-31
Countries
- Denmark
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Three Methods for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT00529958 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Functional Outcomes 2 Years After ACL Repair and InternalBrace Ligament Augmentation in Comparison With ACL Reconstruction
NCT04429165 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Quadriceps and Semitendinosus Grafts in ACL Reconstruction Using Data From the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry (DKRR)
NCT06980285 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Standard ACL Reconstruction vs ACL + Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Study
NCT02018354 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between All-Inside and Complete Tibial Tunnel Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Patients With ACL Ruptures
NCT07023653 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Can Targeted Exercise Improve Knee Strength Following ACLR (RATE)
NCT02939677 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of ACL Reconstruction in Biomechanical Properties of Ankle Joint Complex
NCT06631690 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Over-the-Top vs. Anteromedial ACLR With Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis
NCT06664047 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Hamstring Muscle Strength After ACL Hamstring Reconstruction
NCT05464485 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Can Sensorimotor Function Predict Graft Rupture After ACL Reconstruction
NCT04162613 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Reduced Knee Flexion Strength 18 Years After ACL Reconstruction in Hamstring Group Compared to Patellar Tendon Group
NCT05876013 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Reconstruction of the Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) With Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Surgery
NCT02680821 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Demographic Parameters and ACL Injury on the Association Among Clinical, Functional and Biomechanical Parameters
NCT05644275 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction With Bone Tendon Bone Autograft With Versus Without Internal Bracing
NCT05532189 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Graft Tensioner Device in ACL (Knee) Repair
NCT00221273 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
How to Best Treat Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
NCT04770233 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial Comparing Three Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructive Procedures
NCT00418964 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT04484961 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Functional Outcome of Site Peroneus Longus Graft Donors With and Without Distal Stump Suturing of Peroneus Tendon Brevis on ACL Reconstruction Case in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in Jakarta With 24 Patient as Subject Who Will Divide Into 2 Group.
NCT04431063 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Outcomes Comparison in Patients Using Knee Brace Post ACL Reconstruction With Autograft Bone Quadricep Tendon
NCT05457452 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Medical and Economical Evaluation of Computer-assisted Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL)
NCT00492609 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Individualized Anterior Cruciate Ligament Versus Conventional Reconstruction
NCT04366362 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Methods in Post Operative Knee Arthroscopy Rehabilitation
NCT05735236 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Remnant-Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Healthy Controls
NCT05245461 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Outcomes and Complication Rates of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the "Over-the-top" Technique Combined With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in Patients Over 50 Years Old, Compared With a Control Group of Patients Under 30
NCT07041242 ·Status: RECRUITING