MR Guided Focused Ultrasound vs Radiotherapy for Palliative Pain Tx in Bone Metastases

NCT05250687 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2024-10-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a prospective, single-center, randomized study directly comparing outcomes after MR guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR HIFU) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatment of painful bone metastases.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

MR- High intensity focused ultrasound

The intervention treatment is MR-HIFU, which will be given as a standalone treatment. MRHIFU treatment will be delivered using the ExAblate 2100 System (INSIGHTEC, Tirat Carmel, Israel), which is an FDA-approved device for pain palliation of bone metastasesThe ExAblate focused ultrasound device operates in conjunction with an MRI machine. Gadavist is being administered intraveneously as contrast medium for MRI.

RADIATION

External beam radiotherapy

Standard of care for pain palliation of bone metastases consists of single fraction external beam radiotherapy of 8-16 Gray (Gy) or a multi-fraction regime of 20 Gy in 5 fractions, 24 Gy in 6 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The radiation schedule is at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Pejman Ghanouni, MD, PhD · Stanford University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-06-30
Primary Completion
2024-12-31
Completion
2024-12-31
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05250687 on ClinicalTrials.gov