Trial of Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Induced Paresthesia Using Ultrasonic vs. Reciprocating Saw Instrumentation
NCT05205616 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32
Last updated 2025-06-04
Summary
The aim of this prospective study is to analyze the postoperative paresthesias experienced in patients who undergo bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) using an ultrasonic saw, versus a reciprocating saw. Patients included in the study are ages 15-45 scheduled to undergo BSSO surgery at the University of California, San Francisco. One side of the patient's mandible will be instrumented with either the Stryker Sonopet ultrasonic saw or traditional reciprocating saw, while the other side will receive the remaining intervention (determined via randomization on the day of surgery). Patient paresthesias will then be analyzed on each side for 3 months postoperatively (at postoperative days: 1, 7, 14, 28, and 84). Sensory examinations will be carried out by blinded examiners using von Frey hairs and two point discrimination testing. Patients will also subjectively rate their sensation on each side. The results will then be analyzed to determine if patient paresthesias, including the severity and duration, differed depending on which instrument was used, the ultrasonic or reciprocating saw.
Conditions
- Surgical Complication
- Paresthesia
- Fracture
- Nerve Injury
- Nerve Entrapments
- Mandibular Nerve Injuries
- Mandibular Hypoplasia
- Mandibular Retrognathism
- Mandibular Hyperplasia
- Mandibular Prognathism
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Sonopet ultrasonic saw
Ultrasonic saw to be used on a randomized side of the mandible, reciprocating saw will be used on other side
- DEVICE
-
Reciprocating saw
See above description
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of California, San Francisco
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Sohail Saghezchi, DDS, MD · UC San Francisco
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-07-20
- Primary Completion
- 2023-07-25
- Completion
- 2023-07-25
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Neurosensory Assesment After Using Separators Vs Chisels in Bilateral Sagittal Split Mandibular Osteotomy. RCT
NCT04824456 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-Guided Suprazygomatic Maxillary Nerve Block as A Part of Multimodal Analgesic Regimens
NCT05023239 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Effects of the Bilateral Mandibular Nerve Block (V3) in Mandibular Osteotomy
NCT02618993 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Lap-assisted vs. US-Guided Visualization of TAP Blocks
NCT04226300 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Visualizing Peripheral Nerves Using Ultrasound-Guided Approach
NCT00221949 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ultrasound-guided Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Study
NCT03748329 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Location of Local Anesthetic Injection for Ultrasound Guided Interscalene Block
NCT01877330 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Ultrasound in Upper Extremity Blocks.
NCT00221884 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Post-operative Analgesia Efficacy Using Ultrasound-guided Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Type II Block.
NCT03100994 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound Guided Needle Placement Versus Nerve Stimulation for Coracoid Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
NCT00326261 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Efficiency of Preoperative Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Applied With Ultrasound and Success of Spinal Anesthesia
NCT06209372 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Maxillary and Mandibular Nerve Block. Block One Get One Free.
NCT06599138 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-assisted Versus Real-time Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Elderly Patients
NCT06241716 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guidance Versus Electrical Stimulation for Continuous Popliteal-Sciatic Nerve Blocks
NCT00876681 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Retroclavicular Versus Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Hand and Forearm Surgery
NCT02641613 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ultrasound Guidance for Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
NCT00702416 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Ultrasound-Guided Retroclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
NCT01605929 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Automatic Periodic Stimulation and Continuous Electromyography (EMG) for Facial Nerve Monitoring During Parotidectomy
NCT03172520 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-Guided Intermediate Versus Deep Cervical Plexus Block for Carotid Endarterectomy
NCT05353218 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Sciatic Nerve Blocks: Popliteal Versus Subgluteal Catheters
NCT01325012 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
USG Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Extremity Surgery
NCT01993290 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Low Volume Versus High Volume of Local Anesthetic in Ultrasound Guided Combined Supraclavicular and Interscalene Block for Upper Limb Surgery
NCT07028957 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Limb Orthopedic Surgery
NCT03913650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Minimum Effective Concentration of Ropivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Block
NCT02286336 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of US and Evoked Motor Response-guided Placement of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block Following TKA
NCT03121976 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA