Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound Guided Needle Placement Versus Nerve Stimulation for Coracoid Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
NCT00326261 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL
Last updated 2008-12-18
Summary
Nerve blocks for arm and hand surgery provide many advantages for patients including excellent pain control and reduction in general anesthesia-related adverse effects. Infraclavicular block is possibly the best method for performing regional anesthesia of the arm because of the consistent anesthesia of the whole arm and low incidence of serious adverse effects. Normally the anesthetist uses nerve stimulation to identify nerves supplying the forearm and hand. Recent research has indicated that to improve success from 60% to 79% two types of muscle stimulation must be sought before injection of local anesthetic. This can be time consuming, requires a significant learning process, increases complications and leaves 21% of patients with inadequate anesthesia requiring supplementation or general anesthesia. More recently practitioners have been using ultrasound imaging to direct the needle and watch local anesthetic spread around the nerves. Preliminary reports have documented that this technique is associated with much greater success than the nerve stimulation method. However a good quality study comparing the dual-endpoint infraclavicular technique with an ultrasound-guided technique has not been performed. This randomized study aims to rectify this deficiency by determining if ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block has a significantly greater success than the current standard, dual end-endpoint nerve stimulation technique.
Conditions
- Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Ultrasound compared to dual-endpoint nerve stimulator guided approach.
- PROCEDURE
-
Ultrasound
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
collaborator OTHER -
Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
collaborator OTHER -
University Health Network, Toronto
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Colin JL McCartney, MBChB FRCA FCARCSI FRCPC · University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Retroclavicular Versus Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Hand and Forearm Surgery
NCT02641613 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ultrasound Guidance Vs. Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
NCT00321425 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retroclavicular Approach vs Infraclavicular Approach for Plexic Bloc Anesthesia of the Upper Limb
NCT02913625 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Forearm vs Brachial Plexus Blockade for Routine Hand and Wrist Surgery
NCT03510559 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Selective Trunk and Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks
NCT06004648 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: Influence of Obesity
NCT02033265 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Simultaneous Use of Supraclavicular and Distal Blocks
NCT01989312 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ultrasound-Guided Axillary or Infraclavicular Nerve Block for Upper Limb Surgery
NCT00724035 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Visualizing Peripheral Nerves Using Ultrasound-Guided Approach
NCT00221949 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ultrasound-guided Versus Blind Technique in Medial Brachial Cutaneous Nerve and Intercostobrachial Nerve Blocks
NCT02940847 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Brachial Plexus Blocks and Selective Distal Blocks in Terms of Anesthesia
NCT05656625 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of the Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Continuous Ultrasound-guided Brachial Plexus Block.
NCT04053491 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Echogenic and Nonechogenic Needles in Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
NCT02862041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Visualization Versus Electrical Nerve Stimulation
NCT01010412 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison 1 Plane-2 Injection and 2 Plane-2 Injection Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
NCT02533557 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Single , Intra- Cluster and Double-injection Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Block of Brachial Plexus
NCT03188939 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
US Guided Axillary Block With Only One Injection
NCT02334176 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Central Versus Peripheral Placement of Local Anesthetic
NCT00699244 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Regional Changes in Upper Limb Perfusion Following Brachial Plexus Block: A Pilot Study
NCT02589054 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Infraclavicular Versus Axillary Approach to Brachial Plexus Block
NCT02208245 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Nerve Stimulator Versus Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Block
NCT02344615 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three Techniques for Ultrasound Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block
NCT02073383 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Supraclavicular Block vs Retroclavicular Block: Incidence of Phrenic Nerve Paralysis
NCT02631122 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Is Perfusion Index an Indicator of Block Success in Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
NCT04921891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison 1 Plane-1 Injection and 2 Plane-2 Injection Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
NCT02505633 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA