The Acute Cardiorespiratory Response to Blood-flow Restricted Versus Traditional Exercise Training Regimens (CaRe BFR)

NCT05163600 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24

Last updated 2026-07-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators hypothesize that BFR exercise regimens result in a different acute cardiorespiratory response pattern compared to traditional exercise regimens. Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that these patterns differ between healthy participants and participants with COPD.

Regarding secondary objective, the investigators hypothesize that BFR results in lower blood pressure responses compared to traditional exercise training in both healthy and COPD participants.

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

BFR-CYC 50% peak / 50% AOP (exhaustive)

BFR-CYC: Continuous cycling at 50% peak work rate (PWR) with bilateral thigh cuffs inflated to 50% limb occlusion pressure (LOP). A maximum duration of 30 minutes is applied as a safety limit.

OTHER

BFR-CYC 3x2min

BFR-CYC: Three intervals of 2 minutes at 50% PWR, separated by 1-minute recovery periods, with bilateral thigh cuffs inflated to 50% LOP during exercise intervals.

OTHER

BFR Resistance 80% LOP

BFR-RE: Unilateral right-leg press at 40% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) with cuffs inflated to 80% LOP. Protocol: 4 sets (30-15-15-15 repetitions).

OTHER

BFR REsistance 48% vs. 80% LOP

* BFR at 40% LOP * BFR at 80% LOP All sessions will be conducted on a leg press device under standardized laboratory conditions. Pneumatic cuffs will be applied to the proximal thigh of the right leg. Participants will perform unilateral right-leg press exercise at 40% 1RM using a standardized protocol of 4 sets (30-15-15-15 repetitions) with fixed rest intervals. The protocol will be completed as prescribed (not to volitional exhaustion) unless predefined safety criteria require early termination.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Zurich

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Christian Clarenbach, Dr. med · University of Zurich

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-05-20
Primary Completion
2026-12-31
Completion
2026-12-31

Countries

  • Switzerland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05163600 on ClinicalTrials.gov