Evaluation of Treatment Duration of En-masse Versus Two Steps Retraction in Patients Having Maxillary Protrusion

NCT04921579 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2021-06-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Brief summary: there's a scarcity in literature concerning time needed to retract anterior segment following premolars extraction. the purpose of this study is to determine, in orthodontic patients with maxillary protrusion, which form of technique of retraction offers a faster treatment duration of retraction : en-masse or two step techniques

Conditions

  • Bimaxillary Protrusion

Interventions

PROCEDURE

En masse retraction

Retraction stated on a 0.017''x 0.025'' Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain ( force applied 200 g per side) extending between the crimpable hooks and the mini-screw.

PROCEDURE

Two-Step retraction

Retraction of canine started on a 0.017''x0.025'' Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain ( force applied 150 g per side) followed by anterior teeth retraction on 0.017''x0.025'' Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain ( force applied 160 g per side) extending between crimpable hooks and the mini-screw.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Future University in Egypt

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Yehia Mostafa, professor and chairman · Future University in Egypt

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
14 Years
Max Age
24 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-12-15
Primary Completion
2021-01-21
Completion
2021-01-21

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04921579 on ClinicalTrials.gov