MedTrace Logo

The Treatment Effect of Endoscopic Evacuation Versus Suboccipital Craniotomy for Spontaneous Intracerebellar Hemorrhage.

NCT04991233 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 190

Last updated 2021-08-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of the present study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of two surgery evacuation methods (endoscopic surgery and suboccipital craniotomy) in the treatment of acute spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage (SCH). A multi-center randomized control trial will be conducted. Patients with an initial GCS score of 5-14 will be screened and enrolled in the first 24 hours after SCH.

Conditions

  • Posterior Fossa Hemorrhage

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Endoscopic surgery

The endoscopic surgery will be conducted to evacuate the hemorrhage within 24 hours after SCH.

PROCEDURE

Suboccipital craniotomy surgery

The suboccipital craniotomy surgery will be conducted to evacuate the hemorrhage within 24 hours after SCH.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tang-Du Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Yan Qu, M.D Ph.D · Tang-Du Hospital

  • Wei Guo, M.D Ph.D · Tang-Du Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-03-01
Primary Completion
2023-12-31
Completion
2024-12-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04991233 on ClinicalTrials.gov