Euploid Rate of Blastocyst Derived From PPOS VS Antagonist Protocol

NCT04989348 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 240

Last updated 2024-02-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In-vitro fertilization (IVF) involves multiple follicular development, oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer after fertilization. Despite recent advances in ovarian stimulation, the method of assisted fertilization and improved culture conditions, the implantation potential of embryos remains around 30-35% for a long time.

Gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists have been used in IVF to prevent the LH surge and the premature ovulation and are given in the luteal phase of the preceding cycle or in the follicular phase of the treatment cycle i.e. the long GnRH agonist. GnRH antagonists are now commonly used during IVF. In addition to the advantage of its simplicity, the use of antagonist is associated with a substantial reduction in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome without reducing the chance of achieving live birth when compared with the long agonist protocols. \[1\]

Progestin can inhibit the pituitary LH surge during ovarian stimulation and various studies show progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is effective in blocking the LH surge in IVF \[2-5\]. More and more centers in China are using PPOS because this regimen appears simpler and cheaper. Because of its negative effect on the endometrium, fresh transfer of embryos is not possible and elective freezing of all embryos is required. PPOS protocol is indicated in women who freeze all embryos because of various reasons such as undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy or the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

One prospective non-randomized study comparing the PPOS vs short GnRH agonist protocol shows similar oocytes retrieved between the two protocols, and the incidence of premature LH surge, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rates shows no significant difference. \[2\] A recent randomized trial comparing medroxyprogesterone and GnRH antagonist in an oocyte donation program showed a similar number of mature oocytes but reported lower ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate of recipients of oocyte donors who had received medroxyprogesterone in IVF \[6\]. However, the oocyte recipients in that trial were not randomized. Therefore, it is not possible to conclude the effect of progestin used in IVF on the pregnancy outcomes. It is possible that the PPOS protocol may have an adverse effect on the euploid rate of embryos, leading to a lower live birth rate.

Conditions

  • IVF

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist protocol

Women will receive antagonist (Cetrorelix 0.25mg) once subcutaneously daily from day 6 of ovarian stimulation till the day of the ovulation trigger or

PROCEDURE

Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol

Women will receive oral medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily or Duphaston 10mg bd from Day 3 till the day of ovulation trigger.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The University of Hong Kong

    collaborator OTHER
  • Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
43 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-08-04
Primary Completion
2023-03-01
Completion
2024-02-20

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04989348 on ClinicalTrials.gov