Trigger Timing in Ovarian Stimulations
NCT04163133 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 834
Last updated 2026-01-05
Summary
The use of antagonist ovulation stimulation program is increasing year by year, because of its convenience, flexibility, and prevention effect of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. However, many researchers and clinicians believe that the clinical outcomes of antagonist regimens are worse than those of classical long-term regimens. Studies showed that the reasons for that maybe antagonist protocol results in poor effect on oocytes maturation or endometrial receptivity.
At present, the trigger time of antagonist regimen is more than three follicles with diameters of ≥17 mm, which makes the duration of gonadotrophin application in antagonist regimen is shorter than that of long regimen. Whether the trigger time of antagonist regimen is too early to cause adverse effects on oocytes, embryos and eventual clinical outcomes is unknown.
This study hopes to compare regular trigger timing and 1~2 days delay of trigger in ovarian stimulations by antagonist protocol,in order to study whether delay 1~2 days of trigger will get better clinical outcomes than regular trigger timing in ovarian stimulations by antagonist protocol in in vitro fertilization (IVF)/Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
The results of this study will help infertile couples and clinicians to know and choose the optimal treatment in antagonist protocol.
Conditions
- IVF Outcome
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
1~2 days later trigger than regular timing
During ovarian stimulation, 1~2 days later of trigger after three follicles reach 17mm bilateral with contineous using of Gonadotrophin in antagonist protocol.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Peking University Third Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Li · Peking University Third Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 42 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-03-31
- Completion
- 2028-03-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
GnRH for Luteal Support in IVF/ICSI/FET Cycles
NCT02357654 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Progesterone Diurnal Rhythm During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF
NCT02975713 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Luteal Phase Support With GnRH Agonist After GnRH Agonist Triggering in IVF/ICSI Cycles
NCT06150703 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparing Coasting by Withholding GnRH Agonist With GnRH Antagonist
NCT01347268 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Micronized Progesterone vs Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist in Freeze-all IVF Cycles.
NCT04108039 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of a Dual Trigger on Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Reproductive Outcomes
NCT01979341 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ovarian Stimulation Using Recombinant Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH) and Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist in Alternate Days
NCT01468441 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Repeated Injection of GnRH Agonist to Reduce Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
NCT02022241 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonist on Triggering Day: A Randomized Controlled Study
NCT00571870 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clomiphene Citrate (CC)/Gonadotropin/Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist Versus Gonadotropin/GnRH Agonist
NCT00830492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparative Assessment of the Clinical Utility of Ovarian Stimulation With Menotropin Versus Menotropin Plus GnRH Antagonist
NCT01331733 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Dual Triggering in Patients With a High Immature Oocyte Rate
NCT02813239 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Triggering Oocyte Maturation in Normoresponders Using Double Trigger or HCG Trigger
NCT06146413 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Ovarian Response in Oocyte Donors Triggered With GnRH Agonists
NCT05109403 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Growth Hormone Co-treatment Within a GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Patients With Poor Ovarian Response
NCT03373149 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Live Birth Rate Between PPOS and GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Patients With Anticipated High Ovarian Response
NCT04414761 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Transfer of Fresh Versus Frozen/Thawed Embryos in IVF Cycles Where GnRH Agonist is Utilized for Oocyte Maturation.
NCT00365027 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dual Trigger Versus Booster Dose of HCG
NCT02397642 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prolonged Protocol of Early Follicular or Mid Luteal Phase
NCT04522479 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Generic Versus Reference Cetrorelix Acetate for Ovarian Stimulation Using a Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone(GnRH)Antagonist Protocol in Women Undergoing IVF
NCT06023602 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
GnRH Agonist Trigger and Modified Luteal Phase Support, Adding a Bolus of GnRHa at the Time of Implantation - a RCT
NCT02053779 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
GnRh Antagonist Protocol With Delayed Start Stimulation in Patients With Poor Ovarian Response
NCT03134690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Frozen Embryo Transfer With GnRH-antagonist Trial
NCT03763786 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Use of Antagonist Versus Agonist GnRH in Oocyte Recipient Endometrium Preparation
NCT00633347 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Dual Trigger Versus GnRHa Trigger Combined With Luteal HCG Administration
NCT02330770 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4