Moses vs. Thulium Laser Study
NCT04963062 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 114
Last updated 2023-06-22
Summary
The incidence of urinary tract stone disease is increasing. According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, as of 2012, 10.6% of men and 7.1% of women in the United States are affected by renal stone disease. This has led to an increased demand on Urologists for efficient and safe surgical treatment of stone disease. Over the past two decades, ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy has become the treatment of choice for most ureteral and renal stones globally. The holmium laser is considered the gold standard for laser lithotripsy. Holmium laser lithotripsy with Moses and the thulium laser are new technologies meant to improve the efficiency of laser lithotripsy. Both are FDA approved treatment modalities for stone disease. Two in vitro studies have compared Moses versus thulium and shown that thulium has higher ablative volumes then the holmium laser with Moses, but no clinical trials have compared the two treatment modalities.
In this study, investigators are going to conduct a prospective, randomized clinical trial to determine whether there is a difference in procedural time, intraoperative parameters or stone free rate between the Holmium laser with Moses and the thulium laser. This is significant as this may lead to shorter overall operative times, which may result in decreased operative costs and complications.
Conditions
- Urinary Tract Stone
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Holmium laser with Moses lasers
The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
- DEVICE
-
Holmium laser with thulium lasers
The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Wisconsin, Madison
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Stephen Nakada, MD · University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 89 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-07-16
- Primary Completion
- 2022-05-30
- Completion
- 2023-05-02
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effectiveness of Holmium and Thulium Lasers With Ureteroscopy for Urinary Lithiasis
NCT04871984 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Thulium Fiber Laser vs. Holmium:YAG Laser for the Ureteroscopic Treatment of Patients With Urinary Stone Disease
NCT06306222 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
TFL vs MOSES Holmium Laser in the En-bloc Resection of Bladder Tumors
NCT06373419 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficiency of Holmium Laser Settings on Urinary Stones
NCT03526458 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Semi-rigid Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06489366 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Mirabegron and Tamsulosin for Ureteral Stone Expulsion
NCT07310797 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Economics of SOLTIVE Compared to Ho:YAG Laser in Urolithiasis
NCT04997668 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MOSES Lithotripsy Technology Applied to Stone Fragmentation During Ureteroscopy
NCT03995758 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteroscopic Laser Modality on Total Lasing Time and Total Energy in Patients With Large, Dense Renal Calculi
NCT05869890 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Stent Omission After Ureteroscopy and Lithotripsy in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative
NCT05866081 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Super Pulse Fiber Thulium Laser and Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Fragmentation During Ureteroscopy
NCT06667557 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Thulium vs. Hol:YAG Laser
NCT05808257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Lithotripsy During URS - Holmium vs Thulium
NCT04668586 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
to Compare the Effectiveness of Thulium Fiber Laser and Holmium YAG Laser for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
NCT05218057 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ho:YAG Laser Versus Thulium Laser for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones During SMP
NCT05190536 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Differences in Postoperative Symptoms With Four Ureteral Stents
NCT06083051 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
HoYAG vs TFL in miniPCNL With ClearPetra
NCT07087977 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Thulium Fiber Laser Prospective Trial
NCT05814133 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Medical Expulsive Therapy Post-SWL For Renal Stones
NCT05032287 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Patients After ESWL Treated With Ureteral Stents Versus Expulsion Therapy With Tamsulosin
NCT00478998 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Performance of the SOLTIVE Laser System for Laser Lithotripsy in Kidney or Ureteral Stones
NCT04556201 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Super-Pulsed Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium:YAG Laser in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Ureteral and Renal Stones
NCT07012941 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Ureterorenoscopy With Lithotripsy Alone Versus Combination With Hydrogel for Kidney Stone Removal
NCT06469736 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Assessing Renal Damage During Ureteroscopy
NCT05350423 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT01514032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA