MedTrace Logo

Implantation of Continent Catheterizable Channel : Native Bladder or Enterocystoplasty ?

NCT04922437 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 106

Last updated 2021-06-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

PURPOSE. To compare the results between two sites of implantation of the continent catheterizable channel (CCC): native bladder or enterocystoplasty.

METHODS. Retrospective monocentric study of pediatrics and adult patients who underwent a continent cystostomy between 1991 and 2020 with a continent catheterizable channel implanted in the native bladder's detrusor (D group) or the enterocystoplasty (EC group).

Conditions

  • Neurogenic Bladder
  • Continent Cutaneous Urinary Diversion
  • Mitrofanoff

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Native bladder implantation

Continent catheterizable channel implanted in the detrusor of the native bladder

PROCEDURE

Enterocystoplasty implantation

Continent catheterizable channel implanted by seromuscular plicature on the front wall of the bladder augmentation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Central Hospital, Nancy, France

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Pierre Lecoanet · CHRU Nancy

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-01-01
Primary Completion
2021-01-01
Completion
2021-06-30

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04922437 on ClinicalTrials.gov