Premedication With Atenolol Versus Metoprolol for Controlled Hypotensive Anesthesia During Nasal Surgeries

NCT04914234 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2025-08-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of oral atenolol versus oral metoprolol as a premedication for controlled hypotensive anesthesia during nasal surgeries.

Background: Mucosal bleeding is the most frequent complication with nasal surgeries, as it interferes with the optimal visualization of the intranasal anatomy, increases operation time, and consequently increases blood loss. There are several pharmacological and non-pharmacological techniques for the appropriate control of intraoperative bleeding.

Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase four, comparative clinical trial; carried out on 60 patients, who were candidates for nasal surgeries under general anesthesia at our hospital. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups; group A, received oral atenolol, and group M, received oral metoprolol.

Conditions

  • Hypotension Drug-Induced

Interventions

DRUG

Atenolol Succinate Oral Tablet

Atenolol 50 mg

DRUG

Metoprolol Succinate Oral Tablet

Metoprolol 100 mg

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Damanhour Teaching Hospital

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Ahmed M Shaat, MD · Damanhour Teaching Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-08-01
Primary Completion
2026-01-15
Completion
2026-01-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04914234 on ClinicalTrials.gov