A Randomized Controlled Study of Different Trigger Modes of Antagonist Regimen in Patients With Low Ovarian Reserve
NCT04717752 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 310
Last updated 2021-01-28
Summary
Assisted reproductive technology (ART), especially controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), significantly increased clinical pregnancy rates among infertile patients. However, about 9% to 24% of patients had poor ovarian response to gonadotropins (GNS) stimulation, which was called poor ovarian response (POR). In recent years, the diagnosis and treatment of patients with low fertility is the challenge for reproductive medicine. To better demonstrate the effectiveness of various interventions and distinguish the different subgroups of patients, 2016 POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number) standard changed low reaction into low prognosis of patient-oriented individual strategies to obtain eggs. For patients in group 3 and group 4 classified by POSEIDON, ovarian reserve function decline, follicular development desynchrony and low numbers of oocytes obtained lead to poor prognosis. In 2020, the prognosis based on Delphi method of assisted reproductive technology to treat low crowd diagnosis expert opinion in China recommended to give these patients conventional cosine solutions such as antagonist. In the first cycle, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) starting dose of 225 \~ 300 iu is suggested to achieve plenty of ovarian stimulation for standards and maximize the benefits of superovulation. Because of the particularity of luteal support in the antagonist regimen, it is of great clinical significance to explore the trigger mode and combination mode of luteal support in the antagonist regimen for patients with poor prognosis.
Conditions
- Poor Ovarian Response
Interventions
- DRUG
-
recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin for injection
- DRUG
-
Troprilin
triptorelin acetate injection
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Nanjing University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 21 Years
- Max Age
- 42 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-01-20
- Primary Completion
- 2021-10-31
- Completion
- 2021-12-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Study of Long-acting and Short Acting Triptorelin in PCOS Patients Who Underwent IVF/ICSI
NCT02477566 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
DEPO-Trigger Trial: GnRH Agonist DEPOt TRIGGER for Final Oocyte Maturation
NCT04616729 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Evaluation of the Optimal Dose of GnRH Agonist for Triggering Final Oocyte Maturation in High Risk OHSS Patients
NCT01973842 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
GnRH Agonist Triggering Supplemented With Hcg in Women With Poor Ovarian Response
NCT02144818 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproduction With Two Different Forms of Pituitary Suppression
NCT01565265 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
GnRH Agonist Trigger and Modified Luteal Phase Support, Adding a Bolus of GnRHa at the Time of Implantation - a RCT
NCT02053779 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
GnRH Agonist (GnRHa) Withdrawal at Late Stage of Long Protocol and the Incidence of Ovarian Hyper-stimulation
NCT01634724 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Growth Hormone Co-treatment Within a GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Patients With Poor Ovarian Response
NCT03373149 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Intranasal Nafarelin For Triggering Oocyte Maturation
NCT06763926 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
RCT of Low-dose Clomiphene vs. High Dose Gonadotropin Protocol for IVF Poor Responders
NCT01577199 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Low Dose GnRHa Early Luteal Phase Down Regulation Versus GnRHa Ultra-short Protocol for Poor Ovarian Response
NCT02940535 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
hCG Priming in Women With Low Ovarian Reserve
NCT04643925 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Three Dosage Strengths of Pulsatile GnRH
NCT00296465 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison of Triggers in Double Ovarian Stimulation (DuoStim).
NCT05321511 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Corifollitropin Alfa Followed by hpHMG in a Long GnRH Agonist Protocol for the Treatment of Poor Ovarian Responders
NCT01732094 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Study Using Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin (rhCG, Ovidrel®) in the Induction of Final Follicle Maturation and Early Luteinization in Chinese Women Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer (IVF/ET)
NCT01081756 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol Versus Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders
NCT04537078 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effect of GnRH Agonist Treatment Protocols on Ovarian Reserve
NCT05567731 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Progesterone Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol Versus Antagonist Protocol for PCO Patient
NCT05847660 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ovarian Response Prediction in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Patients
NCT01206803 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness of Low Dose Gonadotropin Stimulation Protocol Vs High Dose Gonadotropin Protocol in Poor Responders
NCT06778733 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Ovarian Stimulation Using Recombinant Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH) and Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist in Alternate Days
NCT01468441 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of GnRH Antagonist vs Agonist Long on IVF Outcome, Peak Estradiol Level,and Duration of Stimulation
NCT01669291 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ovarian Stimulation With FSH Alone Versus FSH Plus GnRH Antagonist in an Oocyte Donor/Recipient Programme
NCT05759871 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Ultrashort GnRH Agonist/Antagonist Versus GnRH Antagonist IVF
NCT02173977 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2