MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between the Effect of Ultrasound Debridement and Conventional Treatment in Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU).

NCT04716790 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2021-04-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators aimed to elucidate the effects of ultrasound debridement on the area and healing of diabetic foot ulcers compared to their conventional treatment.

Conditions

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Ultrasound Debridement

Ultrasounds debridement is performed using an SONOCA 185 device (Söring GmbH, Germany). The ultrasounds device generates an ultrasound low frequency of 25kHz and is equipped with three instruments with different sonotrode shapes. The choice of sonotrode depends on wound depth. The ultrasounds instrument piezoelectrically transforms the electrical energy delivered from the ultrasound device into mechanical oscillations in the sonotrode tip.

PROCEDURE

Conventional Treatment

Conventional Treatment based on international guidelines for diabetic foot

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Yolanda García Álvarez

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • Francisco Javier Álvaro Afonso

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Yolanda García Álvarez · Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-04-20
Primary Completion
2022-01-18
Completion
2023-06-23

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04716790 on ClinicalTrials.gov