Improving Communication and Healthcare Outcomes for Patients With Communication Disabilities

NCT04697212 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 687

Last updated 2025-11-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In the United States, 14% of all adults report a speech, language, voice, and/or hearing disability (collectively known as communication disabilities, CD). Patients with CD, experience inequities in receipt of and access to high-quality healthcare services, including primary care. Poor patient-provider communication is a significant contributor to these disparities. When healthcare providers use evidence-based communication strategies, patients with CD have improved communication outcomes and satisfaction. Unfortunately, providers rarely use the strategies in practice. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and implementation of two interventions to increase primary care providers' use of communication strategies, improving the quality of their communication with patients with CD.

Using a stepped-wedge study design and guided by the RE-AIM framework, we will compare a healthcare team-directed intervention (training) to a healthcare team-directed intervention + patient-directed intervention (patient-prompt list). In the healthcare team-directed intervention, the team will receive training on evidence-based communication strategies for patients with CD. In the patient-directed intervention, patients with CD will complete a "patient prompt" list that elicits strategies that they prefer the healthcare team to use during their visit.

The primary aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of the interventions on patient-reported experience in primary care practices across 4 healthcare systems using a stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial.

Hypothesis 1: Patients with CD will report a higher quality of health, more positive experience, and greater self-efficacy when they use the patient-directed tool (intervention A+B) as compared to patients with CD in the healthcare team education-only phase (intervention A).

Hypothesis 2. Providers will use more patient-centered communication and strategies with the patient-directed intervention.

The second aim is to examine the adoption, implementation, and short-term sustainability of the interventions.

Conditions

  • Communication Disabilities

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Healthcare team- + patient-directed intervention

Participants will experience a clinical encounter with a healthcare team that has received training on evidence-based communication strategies for patients with communication disabilities, and will also complete a "patient prompt" list that elicits strategies that they prefer the healthcare team to use during their visit.

BEHAVIORAL

Healthcare team-directed intervention

Participants will experience a clinical encounter with a healthcare team that has received training on evidence-based communication strategies for patients with communication disabilities.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

    collaborator OTHER
  • Mayo Clinic

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Illinois at Chicago

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Michigan

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Colorado, Denver

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Megan A Morris, PhD, MPH · New York University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-12-13
Primary Completion
2024-02-28
Completion
2024-02-28

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04697212 on ClinicalTrials.gov