MedTrace Logo

Does the Mode of Anesthesia Affect the Feto-maternal Outcome in Category-1 Caesarean Section

NCT04634981 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 74

Last updated 2021-09-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Spinal anesthesia (SA) has become the standard technique in elective cesarean section (CS) as it results in less maternal and neonatal morbidity than general anesthesia (GA) (Grade-A recommendation, NICE). For women requiring emergency CS, rapid sequence general anesthesia (RSGA) is commonly used because this technique is faster to perform than SA. Though several randomized trials have compared the maternal and fetal outcome between these two anesthetic techniques, the studies with respect to category 1 CS (emergent conditions that hold immediate threat to life of the woman or fetus) are limited.

Conditions

  • Anesthesia; Adverse Effect
  • Newborn Morbidity

Interventions

PROCEDURE

anesthesia of emergency cesarean section

compare General versus spinal anesthesia

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Benha University

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
40 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-08-12
Primary Completion
2021-01-30
Completion
2021-02-15

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04634981 on ClinicalTrials.gov