Intervention With Selution SLR™ Agent Balloon for Endovascular Latent Limus Therapy for Failing AV Fistulas (ISABELLA) Trial
NCT04629118 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2021-09-27
Summary
The most common problem with haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and arterio-venous grafts (AVG) is stenosis, which can lead to inadequate dialysis, and eventual access thrombosis. Conventional plain old balloon angioplasty (CBA) is associated with high recurrence rates of stenosis and repeated interventions. The advent of successful drug-eluting technology in the treatment of the coronary vascular bed and subsequent positive accumulating evidence in the peripheral arterial circulation has prompted the use of drug coated balloons (DCB) in the access fistula circuit for venous stenosis and in-stent restenosis. Recent studies suggest that DCBs may significantly reduce re-intervention rates on native and recurrent lesions. The restenosis process is in part or in whole the result of neo-intimal hyperplasia (NIH) and NIH is considered the main culprit in access circuit target lesion stenosis. NIH is the blood vessel's healing response to the barotrauma from the angioplasty process. A critical component of NIH is the cellular proliferative stage with mononuclear leucocytes identified as the primary inflammatory cell type involved. The rationale for drug elution is to block the NIH response with an anti-metabolite such as paclitaxel. It is important to emphasize that the role of drug elution in the treatment of vascular stenosis is not to obtain a good haemodynamic and luminal result but to preserve a good result obtained during POBA from later restenosis due to NIH and minimise reinterventions and readmissions to hospital for what is a frail population of patients.
A meta-analysis performed by Khawaja et al. seemed to suggest that DCBs conferred some benefit in terms of improving target lesion primary patency (TLPP) in AVFs. An updated meta-analysis performed by our own institution recently reinforced that DCB appears to be a better and safe alternative to CBA in treating patients with stenosis within all haemodialysis circuits (fistulas and grafts) based on 6- and 12-months primary patency and increased intervention free period 5. However, this was not reflected in the largest RCT to date of DCB vs CBA in AVF with no superior target lesion patency demonstrated at six months and one and two years follow-up. Another recent meta-analysis found paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) showed no statistically significant improvement over conventional balloons in decreasing fistula stenosis in randomized controlled trials but were significant for cohort studies. Hence this shows the heterogeneity of the available data in the literature and the result is dependent on what studies you include in the review. Another reason why the outcome data is variable is that the high-speed blood flow in dialysis access circuits washes a large amount of the paclitaxel away from the target lesion soon after application. A measurement in swine showed that only 20%-30% of paclitaxel was taken up into the coronary artery wall in vivo 15-25minutes after PCB application.
Furthermore, recent attention has been drawn to a possible increase in late mortality signal and lower amputation free survival in patients receiving DCB treatment with paclitaxel for peripheral arterial disease, although this suggestion has not been demonstrated in the data of DCB within the fistula circuit either at 1 or 2 years. In light of these concerns, attention has turned away recently from paclitaxel-based technologies to sirolimus coated platforms. Sirolimus, like paclitaxel, is a potent antiproliferative agent, which has been found to prevent restenosis in the coronary bed and more recently in the peripheral vasculature but to date has not been studied in AVF circuits The aims of the study is to determine the safety and efficacy of the MedAlliance SELUTION SLR 018™ DEB in the treatment of failing AV fistula due to conduit stenosis in patients undergoing renal dialysis.
Conditions
- Arteriovenous Fistula
- Dialysis Access Malfunction
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Selution SLR™ 018 Drug Eluting Balloon
Target lesion will be pre-dilated with high pressure non-compliant balloon, then treated with SELUTION SLR™ 018 DEB Balloon.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Singapore General Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Tjun Yip Tang · Singapore General Hospital
-
Tze Tec Chong · Singapore General Hospital
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 21 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-10-27
- Primary Completion
- 2022-06-30
- Completion
- 2023-10-30
Countries
- Singapore
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs. Intravascular Brachytherapy in In-Stent Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions(SISR)
NCT00231257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Safety and Efficacy Study of the Svelte Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent Delivery System
NCT01788150 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Virtue® SAB in the Treatment of Coronary ISR Trial
NCT07045194 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Balloon-Expandable Stent Versus Self-Expandable Stent for the Atherosclerotic ILIAC Arterial Disease
NCT01834495 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Selution Sirolimus-eluting Balloon for Internal Pudendal-penile Artery Disease-related Erectile Dysfunction
NCT05362994 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Of Safety And Efficacy Of The SUPERA® Nitinol Stent - Iliac Artery
NCT00613418 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Coronary In-stent Restenosis (ISR) by a Sirolimus Coated or a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon
NCT03242096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Agent™ and SeQuent® Please Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheters in Coronary In-stent Restenosis (AGENT-ISR)
NCT02151812 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Debulking With Rotational Atherectomy Versus Balloon Angioplasty In Patients With In-stent Restenosis
NCT03401203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
YUKON-drug-eluting Stent Below The Knee - Randomised Double-blind Study
NCT00664963 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
New Generation Drug Eluting Stent for In-stent Restenosis of Drug Eluting Stent( RESTENT-ISR Trial )
NCT01365572 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
DEB vs Thin-DES in DES-ISR: Long Term Outcomes (DEB Dragon Registry)
NCT04415216 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Direct III Post Market Study
NCT02693158 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Drug-eluting Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent for High Bleeding Risk Angioplasty
NCT04885816 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis (ISR) - Long Lesion Cohort
NCT06492174 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Absorb BVS vs. Drug Coated Balloon for Treatment Of ISR
NCT02474485 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-IV: (LONG-DES-IV)
NCT01186094 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Drug-eluting-stents for Unprotected Left Main Stem Disease (ISAR-LEFT-MAIN)
NCT00133237 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Nonpolymer- and Polymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stents for Restenosis (ISAR-TEST-1)
NCT00140530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Zotarolimus vs Sirolimus Eluting Stent in High Bleeding Risk
NCT05240781 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffold vs. Drug Coated Balloon for Treatment Of In-Stent-Restenosis
NCT03529006 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Initial Double-Blind Drug-Eluting Stent vs Bare-Metal Stent Study.
NCT00233805 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Thin Strut Sirolimus-eluting Stent in All Comers Population vs Everolimus-eluting Stent
NCT02870140 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Elixir Medical Clinical Evaluation of the Novolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System: A Randomized Study "EXCELLA II STUDY"
NCT00792753 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ABRE Clinical Study of the Abre Venous Self-expanding Stent System
NCT03038438 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA