Propofol Versus Sevoflurane During FESS

NCT04619160 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2020-11-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Good surgical conditions are crucial for an optimal surgery result and safe procedure. Minimal blood loss in the surgical field is one of the most important conditions to maintain a good visualization, especially in surgeries with a small surgical field such as a FESS (functional endoscopic sinus surgery). The perioperative blood loss is determined by the main arterial and venous pressure, the local pressure and the capillary vascular filling pressure.

It has been proposed that propofol is a venodilator, which increases the blood flow, but decreases the capillary pressure. On the contrary, sevoflurane might act mainly on the arterioles, which causes an increase in the capillary pressure. In a previous study it has been demonstrated that despite blood pressure maintenance, propofol causes less bleeding during spinal surgery than sevoflurane.

The main aim of this study was to compare both anaesthetics on the perioperative bleeding and haemodynamics during FESS. Secondary, the postoperative nausea, vomiting, pain scores, surgery duration and length of stay at the post-anesthesia care unit will be evaluated.

Conditions

  • Sinus Infection Chronic

Interventions

DRUG

Propofol

TCI 4 µg/mL start until BIS-value of 50

DRUG

Sevoflurane

start 1 MAC, until BIS-value of 50

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Alain F Kalmar, MD, PhD, MSc · Maria Middelares Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-03-01
Primary Completion
2021-03-31
Completion
2021-03-31

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04619160 on ClinicalTrials.gov