HFNO or Conventional Oxygen Therapy for Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Distress

NCT04607967 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 500

Last updated 2024-06-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A quarter of the patients admitted to the Shock Room or Resuscitation Room of an Emergency Department (ED) are admitted for severe hypoxemia resulting from acute respiratory distress. Like all life-threatening conditions, acute respiratory distress (ARD) requires a rapid identification and a prompt implementation of effective resuscitation measures.

Oxygen treatment, first described in 1890, remains one of the most important discoveries in medicine. The purpose of oxygenation is to alleviate respiratory failure and to restore a satisfactory hematosis. The choice of the oxygen delivery device is based on the severity of the hypoxemia, the underlying physiological problems, the type of dyspnea and the patient's tolerance to the device. The most commonly used devices are nasal cannula, face mask and high-concentration face mask (conventional oxygen therapy). High Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO) is now widely used as a complement to conventional oxygen therapy in the EDs.

HFNO ensures good clinical tolerance and better patient comfort (humidification and heating of inhaled gases...) than the other oxygen devices. The HFNO flow rate can go up to 60-70 L/min with an FIO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen inspired oxygen fraction) of 100% compared to a maximum output of 15 L/min with conventional oxygen-therapy.

Given the lack of data and clinical trials concerning the systematic use of HFNO in EDs in cases of severe hypoxemia, a prospective study is essential. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the contribution of early administration of HFNO for patients with acute non-hypercapnic respiratory distress presenting in the ED, with the aim of obtaining rapid correction of hematosis. The objective of this work is to compare Conventional Oxygen Therapy (CO) delivered by nasal cannula or nasal-oral mask at flow rates up to a maximum of 15 liters, to HFNO with the hypothesis that HFNO would reduce the need for ventilation therapy escalation. The other hypotheses concern the interest of the HFNO in reducing the use of intensive care hospitalization and thus the costs of treating these patients.

Conditions

  • Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Distress

Interventions

DEVICE

High Flow Nasal Oxygen

Study participants are suffering from an acute hypoxemic respiratory distress. They have to be treated with oxygen-therapy that could be administered using a conventional oxygen device (study group "CO") or High Flow Nasal Oxygen (study group "HNFO"). During the first 60 minutes following patients admission, patients will be randomized to one of the two study groups. In both groups, the failure of the treatment will be evaluated by the need for a therapeutic escalation fours hours after the treatment initiation.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

    collaborator OTHER
  • centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Vesoul

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Louis APHP

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Poitiers University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

    collaborator OTHER
  • Rennes University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Centre Hospitalier of Chartres

    collaborator OTHER
  • University Hospital, Toulouse

    collaborator OTHER
  • University Hospital, Montpellier

    collaborator OTHER
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-11-23
Primary Completion
2025-05-23
Completion
2025-06-23

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04607967 on ClinicalTrials.gov