MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Two Intraocular Gas Injection Techniques in Macula Hole Surgery

NCT04527848 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 48

Last updated 2020-12-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To undertake a prospective randomized clinical trial of vitrectomy and gas tamponade to treat macular hole, utilizing a small amount of undiluted C3F8 (perfluoropropane) versus a large amount of diluted C3F8 versus a small amount of undiluted SF6 (sulfur hexafluoride) versus a large amount of diluted SF6.

Conditions

  • Macular Holes

Interventions

DRUG

small amount of undiluted C3F8

vitrectomy followed by peeling of the internal limiting membrane and, after that, intraocular gas injection

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Rodrigo PC Lira, PhD · UFPE

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-05-10
Primary Completion
2020-07-31
Completion
2020-07-31

Countries

  • Brazil

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04527848 on ClinicalTrials.gov