Passive Versus Active Educational Interventions for Melanoma Recognition

NCT04507048 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 560

Last updated 2020-12-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study evaluates the efficacy of a passive versus an active educational intervention in increasing the ability of laypersons at low risk for melanoma development, in recognizing atypical skin melanocytic lesions. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive the active or the passive intervention.

Conditions

  • Educational Problems
  • Melanoma (Skin)

Interventions

OTHER

Active educational intervention

an active educational intervention will be provided in the experimental arm, consisting in the administration of a booklet (passive intervention) + an oral standardized explanation of the booklet given by a trained dermatologist for each center.

OTHER

Passive educational intervention

Administration of a booklet containing the explanation of 2 clinical rules for early detection of atypical melanocytic lesions: the ABCDE and the "ugly duckling" rules.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-09-01
Primary Completion
2020-09-30
Completion
2020-09-30

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04507048 on ClinicalTrials.gov