MedTrace Logo

Can the Electronic Nose Smell COVID-19 Antibodies?

NCT04475575 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 222

Last updated 2020-07-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19), spread worldwide and has become an emergency of major international concern. In March 2020, the WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak a global pandemic. Accurate and fast diagnosis is crucial in managing the pandemic. Current diagnostic approaches raise several difficulties: they are time-consuming, expensive, invasive, and most important lacking high sensitivity. The gold standard diagnostic test for COVID-19, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), is highly dependent on adequate deep sampling of the swab in the naso- and oropharynx. A new diagnostic test that can correctly and rapidly identify infected patients and asymptomatic carriers is urgently required to prevent further virus transmission and thus reduce mortality rates.

Aim: This proof-of-principle study aims to investigate if an electronic nose (Aeonose) can distinguish individuals with antibodies from individuals without antibodies against COVID-19 based on analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

Methods: between April and July 2020, persons undergoing RT-PCR and a serology test for COVID-19 were recruited at Maastricht UMC+ for breath analysis. All participants had to breathe through the Aeonose for five consecutive minutes. The VOC pattern in their exhaled breath was then linked to the matching RT-PCR and serological test results.

Conditions

  • SARS-CoV Infection
  • Covid19

Interventions

DEVICE

Aeonose

All participants breathed through the Aeonose for five minutes. This device contains metal-oxide sensors that change in conductivity upon reaction with VOCs in exhaled breath. These conductivity changes are input data for machine-learning and used for pattern recognition. A nose clip was placed on the nose of each participant to avoid entry of non-filtered air in the device. Before measuring, the Aeonose was flushed with room air, guided through a carbon filter as well. During each measurement, a video was displayed to distract the participant and to reduce the chance of hyperventilation. Failed breath tests were excluded from analysis; the reason for failure was documented. Four similar Aeonose devices were used for breath analysis. A full-measurement procedure required sixteen minutes.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Maastricht University Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-04-06
Primary Completion
2020-06-30
Completion
2020-07-01

Countries

  • Netherlands

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04475575 on ClinicalTrials.gov