Fluoroscopic Versus Ultrasound Guidance for Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Geniculate Nerves in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Control Trial
NCT04472702 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90
Last updated 2026-02-20
Summary
Cooled radiofrequency ablation (cRFA) of the knee geniculate nerves is a promising treatment option for knee osteoarthritis, but has variable efficacy. Fluoroscopy is the typical guidance of choice, but uses bony landmarks to target these nerves which have variable positions around the knee. Alternatively, ultrasound allows for targeting based on visualization of bony landmarks, the nerves, and their accompanying vascular structures, and thus may offer greater accuracy. However, there are few studies which directly compare the clinical efficacy of these two guidance options. This study will compare these two options.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
cRFA
cRFA intervention will occur under sterile conditions, the patient will be placed in a supine position on a table and a bolster to provide flexion in the treated knee joint. Skin and soft tissues will be anaesthetized with 2 mL 1% lidocaine at each of the three anatomic sites for cRFA, and a introducer needle will then be placed under ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance to the SLG, SMG, and IMG nerves. Adjustments at these positions will be made when using ultrasound guidance in order to capture the geniculate nerve if the nerve and/or its accompanying vasculature can be directly visualized using greyscale or Doppler modes. When using ultrasound, the physician will note and record whether their positioning of the needle is based on bony landmarks, direct visualization of the nerve, and/or vascularity accompanying the nerve. Once the introducer needle is placed, the cRFA will be placed into the introducer needle.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
American Medical Society for Sports Medicine Collaborative Research Network
collaborator UNKNOWN -
University of California, Davis
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Daniel Herman, MD · University of California, Davis
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 35 Years
- Max Age
- 99 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-02-02
- Primary Completion
- 2026-05-01
- Completion
- 2026-05-01
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Ultrasound-guided Monopolar Versus Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for Genicular Nerves in Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT04112264 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation for Unilateral Knee Arthroplasty Pain Management
NCT02925442 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patients With Chronic Knee Pain Treated With Conventional Radiofrequency of the Genicular Nerves
NCT04234984 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Saphenous Nerve Radiofrequency for Knee Osteoarthritis Trial
NCT02826850 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Effect of Therapeutic Methods for Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
NCT00924677 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Radiofrequency Ablation of Genicular Nerves on Postural Stability in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT03816124 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation Efficacy in Achieving Total Knee Pain Reduction Trial
NCT02947321 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional and Cooled Radiofrequency of the Genicular Nerves in Patients With Chronic Knee Pain
NCT05407610 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Motor Sparing Techniques, Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation Has Emerged As a Viable Alternative to Conservative Therapy and Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06594003 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Heated vs. Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment of the Genicular Nerves for Osteoarthritis Knee Pain
NCT04379895 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RFA or Chemical Neurolysis of the Genicular Nerves Compared to Conservative Treatment for Knee Pain Caused by OA
NCT06094660 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Ultrasound Guided Genicular Nerve Block for Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT04782401 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3-point vs 6-point GNRFA for Chronic KOA
NCT05930756 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Genicular RFT vs Phenol Management in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT05908942 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparative Study of CT and Fluoroscopic Guided Genicular Nerve Ablation in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT06514703 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Revised Targets for Knee Radiofrequency Ablation
NCT06934421 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Pulsed Radiofrequency
NCT06894147 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Denervation Techniques for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Continuous Ablative Radiofrequency Vs. Chemical Denervation with Absolute Alcohol
NCT06858228 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Post-knee Arthroplasty Chronic Pain.
NCT05920382 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pulsed Radiofrequency and Osteoarthritic Chronic Knee Pain
NCT04454710 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MRgFUS in the Treatment of Osteoarthritic Knee Pain
NCT03453372 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predictive Values for the Outcome of Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Pain
NCT05222776 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effect of Genicular Nerve Block on Proprioception in Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT06744842 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Radiofrequency Neurolysis and Chemical Neurolysis of the Genicular Nerves
NCT05340166 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation and Intra-Articular Pulsed Radiofrequency in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
NCT07098455 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA