MedTrace Logo

In the Treatment of Implants With Different Methods; Early Bone Loss and Patient Satisfaction

NCT04459494 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24

Last updated 2020-07-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this clinical study is to compare two different approaches during dental implant applications. One group of patients in the study received flapless approach which is performed without surgical reflection of soft tissues (gums) during implant surgery. In the control group of the study, patients received conventional flap approach in which flap reflections performed on soft tissues (gums) of the patients.

After the surgery patients were monitored for marginal bone loss around implants and discomfort after the surgery for 3 months. And received data statistically analyzed to compare the different surgical procedures.

Conditions

  • Dental Implants

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Flapless implant surgery.

Local anesthesia will be applied to the patients in the test group, and then the implant socket will be prepared without removing the flap and a dental implant will be placed. Bite-wing film will be taken to control the implants in the same session after surgery, and patients will be given VAS (visual analog scale) to perform their assessment of pain on the 3rd day and 7th day. Patients will be given an appointment again after 3 months of treatment. In this session, implants will be evaluated with bite-wing film.

PROCEDURE

Conventional implant surgery.

Local anesthesia will be applied to the patients in the control group, and then the implant socket will be prepared after reflecting the flap and a dental implant will be placed. Patients in the control group will receive a full thickness flap elevation and an implant socket will be prepared afterwards the implant will be placed and then the flap will be closed with 4-0 silk suture. Bite-wing film will be taken from both groups to control the implants in the same session after surgery, and patients will be given VAS (visual analog scale) to perform their assessment of pain on the 3rd day and 7th day. Patients will be given an appointment again after 3 months of treatment. In this session, implants will be evaluated with bite-wing film.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Izmir Katip Celebi University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Şükrü ENHOŞ · Izmir Katip Celebi University Faculty of Dentistry

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-10-15
Primary Completion
2020-06-12
Completion
2020-06-12

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04459494 on ClinicalTrials.gov