MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Two Different Flap Designs for Bilateral Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

NCT03784638 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2019-04-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of lingually-based triangle flap design and buccally based triangular flap design on postoperative swelling, trismus pain after mandibular third molar surgery.

Conditions

  • Impacted Third Molar Tooth

Interventions

PROCEDURE

lingually-based triangle flap design

A mucoperiosteal lingually-based triangle flap will be raised, a conventional rotary handpiece will be used under irrigation for removing the third molar.Primary wound closure will be accomplished using 4-0 silk sutures. The patients will be invited after one week for removing the sutures.

OTHER

buccally based triangular flap design

A mucoperiosteal buccally based triangular flap will be raised, a conventional rotary handpiece will be used under irrigation for removing the third molar.Primary wound closure will be accomplished using 4-0 silk sutures. The patients will be invited after one week for removing the sutures.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Dilek Menziletoglu, DDS, PhD · Necmettin Erbakan University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
45 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-11-30
Primary Completion
2019-03-11
Completion
2019-04-03

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03784638 on ClinicalTrials.gov