Combining Animal-assisted Intervention and Placebo-induced Analgesia
NCT04361968 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 128
Last updated 2020-12-17
Summary
An increased interest of animal-assisted interventions (AAI) can be observed within clinical practice, even though it is still not entirely clear how the presence of an animal contributes to the outcome of a treatment. One theory maintains that the mere presence of an animal influences the therapeutic alliance between therapist and client.
However, results from a recent study suggest that a relationship between patient and health-provider alone is not sufficient to influence treatment outcomes, but that a therapeutic rationale is needed and that verbal instructions and suggestions are highly important in shaping participants' treatment expectations.
To investigate this theory, this study will combine AAI with a placebo intervention, as placebo interventions offer the basic form of intervention working through relationship and expectancy.
The effects of the presence of a dog will be assessed with a standardized experimental heat pain paradigm (TSA-II) in a randomized controlled trial in healthy participants (N=128).
After a baseline measurements of heat pain threshold and tolerance, participants will be randomly assigned to one of the following four conditions: a) placebo intervention , no dog present, b) placebo intervention, dog present, c) no placebo intervention, no dog present and d) no placebo intervention, dog present.
The dog will be introduced after randomization. Expectancy will be induced by telling participants that the contact to an animal increases the oxytocin level, which has an non inflammatory effect.
The placebo intervention will be a deceptive cream which is said to helps against pain.
Afterwards, posttreatment measurements will be conducted and participants fill in questionnaires about their perceptions of the experimenter.
Conditions
- Pain
- Therapeutic Alliance
- Placebo
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Animal-assisted placebo condition
Participants receive the same verbal information as in the Placebo condition. Additionally, participants will receive the same verbal information as in the Dog only condition.
- OTHER
-
Placebo condition
Participants receive verbal information that they are receiving an analgesic cream (i.e. ""Antidolor, containing Lidocain"), which has been shown to produce significant pain reduction in previous clinical trials. However, they will receive an inert cream.
- OTHER
-
Dog only condition
Participants will get a therapeutic rationale for the presence of the dog. The rationale is supported in the literature and therefore not invented for the purpose of this study. Participants will be told that: "Studies have shown the presence of an animal can affect pain perception because the presence and the interaction with an animal can increase our Oxytocin level. Therefore, the investigators want to examine if the presence of a dog has an impact on your pain perception. While participants have to wait for the action time of the cream they are allowed to pet the dog. The intensity of interaction will be documented and be rated on a scale from 1-5 (1=very low degree of interaction, 5=very high degree of interaction). During the experiment the dog will be lying in the room with some distance to participants to avoid further physical interaction. The dog will always be lying at the same spot. Participants will still be able to see the dog.
- OTHER
-
Control Condition
Participants in this condition will receive no intervention. All instructions will be conveyed in a standardized manner to ensure that the participant-experimenter relationship is comparable in terms of friendliness and attention across all four conditions.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Dr. phil. Karin Hediger, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland
collaborator UNKNOWN -
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Karin Hediger, Dr. phil · Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Basel
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- BASIC_SCIENCE
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-06-15
- Primary Completion
- 2020-11-30
- Completion
- 2020-11-30
Countries
- Switzerland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Therapeutic Strategies During Exposure to Pain in an Experimental Design
NCT03146832 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Learning Mechanisms for Placebo and Nocebo Studies on Somatosensory Sensations: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
NCT04387851 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Role of Learning in Nocebo Hyperalgesia
NCT03793790 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Expectations, Attention and the Test Paradigm on the Efficacy of the Pain Processing System
NCT05161286 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Non-pharmacological Treatments for Non-malignant and Malignant Pain
NCT04217681 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trust Game and Placebo Response
NCT02578212 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Developing an Objective Measure of Experienced Pain
NCT05415423 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Internet-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain
NCT03409302 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Gender, Pain, and Placebo Analgesia
NCT00314392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain in Competitive Athletes With Physical Disabilities and Techniques for Its Management
NCT05647031 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pain in Competitive Athletes With Physical Disabilities: Techniques, Support and Perceived Difficulties
NCT05639842 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pain Acceptance Training in Patients Experiencing Emotional Distress and Somatic Symptoms: Examination of Dialectical Thinking as a Mediating Factor
NCT07067619 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Neural and Psychological Mechanisms of Pain Perception
NCT02446262 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pain-related Fear as a Facilitator of Nocebo Hyperalgesia
NCT04197154 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Behavioral Indicators of Pain:Tool Development With Concurrent and Construct Validity
NCT00208052 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Dropout Factors in Chronic Pain Management
NCT04218227 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effects of Multimodal Pain Therapy in Patients With Mixed Chronic Pain Syndromes
NCT01346202 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Supporting Effect of Dronabinol on Behavioral Therapy in Fibromyalgia and Chronic Back Pain
NCT00176163 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Effect of Prayer on Conditioned Pain Modulation and on Pain Intensity in Healthy Religious University Students
NCT04614272 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Interdisciplinary Intervention Versus Brief Intervention for Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain
NCT01346423 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Enhancing Analgesia in Chronic Pain Through Exercise
NCT04862871 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Reliability of Measuring Conditioned Pain Modulation With the Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex
NCT01636440 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain, Learning, and Nocebo
NCT04762836 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Characterization of Nociception Phenotype in Individuals With Intellectual Disability
NCT05473429 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of a Psychoeducational Intervention on Myositis Patients' Quality of Life and Well-Being
NCT06300983 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA