MedTrace Logo

Comparing the Effects of Mobilization With Movement (MWM), Self MWM, and Dynamic Stretching on Hip Internal Rotation)

NCT04279756 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 46

Last updated 2021-02-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study is looking to address the effectiveness of three different intervention on hip range of motion. There will be a therapist performed mobilization group, a self mobilization group, and a dynamic stretching group. Participants will be recruited from the University of South Carolina and randomly assigned between the three groups to have equal distribution and limit any biases. Participants will come in on two different days in order to receive the intervention on the first and have hip range of motion measured on both days. The investigators will be assessing if there is any significant difference between the three groups.

Conditions

  • Hip; Anomaly

Interventions

OTHER

Hip Mobilization with Movement, Self-Mobilization with Movement, Dynamic Stretch

Participants receive either a therapist performed mobilization with movement, a self-mobilization with movement, or a dynamic stretch.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of South Carolina

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Cathy Arnot, DPT · University of South Carolina

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-10-17
Primary Completion
2020-04-06
Completion
2020-04-06

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04279756 on ClinicalTrials.gov