Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Decompressive Ipsilateral Craniectomy for Traumatic Acute Epidural Hematoma

NCT04261673 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2025-10-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Although craniotomy provides a more complete evacuation of the acute epidural hematoma, there are insufficient data to support specific surgical treatment method. We aim to perform a multi-center, parallel-group randomized clinical trial to compare the outcome and cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for the treatment of traumatic brain injury patients with cerebral herniation undergoing evacuation of an acute epidural hematoma.

Conditions

  • Epidural Hematoma
  • Brain Herniation
  • Decompressive Craniectomy
  • Craniotomy

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Decompressive Craniectomy

A large bone flap must be raised. The evacuation of epidural hematoma is depended on surgeon's preference. The bone flap should not be replaced at the end of the operation. DC has an advantage in controlling brain swelling, but patient is necessary to have another operation of cranioplasty to reconstruct the skull in the future.

PROCEDURE

Craniotomy

A large bone flap must be raised. The evacuation of epidural hematoma is depended on surgeon's preference. However, the bone flap must be replaced and fixed with fixation system (plates and screws). The patient will not need an additional operation to rebuild the skull in the future. But undisciplinable brain swelling and increased intracranial pressure may happen in some patients, and additional decompressive craniectomy is recommended in these cases.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Shenzhen Second People's Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • RenJi Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Junfeng Feng, MD · Department of Neurosurgery,Renji Hospital,School of Medicine,Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-05-23
Primary Completion
2025-09-14
Completion
2025-12-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04261673 on ClinicalTrials.gov