Peritoneal in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair 2
NCT04229940 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 115
Last updated 2022-03-31
Summary
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (VHR) is usually performed by reducing the contents in the hernia sac from the abdominal cavity and then covering the defect from the inside with a mesh, i.e. Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM). This means that the hernia sac is left in situ anterior to the mesh. This may, however, predispose for the development of fluid in the hernia sac, i.e. seroma. The risk of seroma development may be reduced if a the defect is closed before the mesh is applied. Closing the defect may, however, cause tension and pain from the abdominal wall. Instead of closing the defect, the part of the peritoneum constituting the hernia sac may be used for closing the defect. In this case, the peritoneum is dissected from the edges of the hernia sac and then used as a flap that is fixated to the edges of the hernia sac on the opposite side. In a previous study (BriClo), we compared defect closure as control group with peritoneal bridging. That study showed an increased risk for postoperative pain if the defect was closed.
In order to evaluate whether peritoneal bridging reduces the seroma development following ventral hernia repair, we are undertaking a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing no closure of the defect with peritoneal bridging. The goal is to randomize 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Clinical follow-up is performed three months, six months and one year after surgery. At all occasions, the patient is requested to fill in the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire (VHPQ) and an investigation is done in order to assess the presence of seromas, recurrences or other local complications. Duration until return to work is registered. One year after surgery, computer tomography is performed in order to quantify the volume of seromas.
Conditions
- Hernia, Ventral
- Seroma as Procedural Complication
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Peritoneal bridging
The defect is covered by peritoneal bridging
- PROCEDURE
-
No peritoneal bridging
The defect is left without bridging
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Region Örebro County
collaborator OTHER - lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-03-01
- Primary Completion
- 2020-12-31
- Completion
- 2021-12-31
Countries
- Sweden
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Influence of Closing the Gap on Postoperative Seroma and Recurrences in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT01719718 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
sIPOM vs pIPOM in Incisional Hernia Patients
NCT05712213 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Recurrence and Patient Satisfaction After Laparoscopic Hernia Repair With Intraperitoneal Onlay-mesh (IPOM)
NCT01839942 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Study Matching Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) and Sublay Mesh to Treat Umbilical Hernia
NCT01201564 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Two Mesh/Fixation Concepts for Laparoscopic Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT02233569 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Treating Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh
NCT02233465 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Robotic Versus Hybrid Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT05233020 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT03490266 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Mesh Position After Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT02177214 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
3D HD Versus 2D HD in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02396940 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pain and Readmission After Lap IPOM vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT05320055 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Modified "Open Intraperitoneal Mesh" Technique of Incisional Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT01953302 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Incisional Hernia Repair Long-term Outcomes
NCT04192838 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biological Mesh Repair of Complex Hernias in High Risk Patients
NCT01997619 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic and Open Incisional Hernia Repair: a Multicenter Cohort Study
NCT01280370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic Versus Open Primary Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT04171921 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Mini/Less Open Sublay(EMILOS) Repair
NCT05912868 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Does a Transabdominal Plane Block Decrease Patient Pain After Ventral Hernia Repair?
NCT02007096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Visible vs. Non-Visible Mesh in Underlay Positon After Repair of Umbilical Hernias
NCT03200405 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraperitoneal Polypropylene Light Weight Wide Pore Soft Mesh Repair for Complex Ventral Hernia.
NCT03994588 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Prospective Multicenter Study Primary Onlay- Mesh After Elective Median Laparotomy in Patients With BMI ≥ 27
NCT01507870 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic High-Ligation Repair of Indirect Inguinal Hernias in Adults
NCT06120114 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tacks Versus Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Treating Defects Between 2 and 5 cm Width
NCT03429374 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraperitoneal Mesh-Implementation After Laparotomy
NCT01003067 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Non-Op Management of Ventral Hernia Patients
NCT02457364 ·Status: UNKNOWN