Peritoneal Bridging in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT03344575 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2020-01-28
Summary
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (VHR) is usually performed by reducing the contents in the hernia sac from the abdominal cavity and then covering the defect from the inside with a mesh, i.e. Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM). This means that the hernia sac is left in situ anterior to the mesh. This may, however, predispose for the development of fluid in the hernia sac, i.e. seroma. The risk of seroma development may be reduced if a the defect is closed before the mesh is applied. Closing the defect may, however, cause tension and pain from the abdominal wall. Instead of closing the defect, the part of the peritoneum constituting the hernia sac may be used for closing the defect. In this case, the peritoneum is dissected from the edges of the hernia sac and then used as a flap that is fixated to the edges of the hernia sac on the opposite side.
In order to evaluate whether peritoneal bridging reduces the seroma development following ventral hernia repair, we are undertaking a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing conventional closure of the hernia defect with peritoneal bridging. The goal is to randomize 50 patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia to conventional closure or closure of the defect with peritoneal bridging.
Clinical follow-up is performed one month and one year after surgery. At both occasions, the patient is requested to fill in the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire (VHPQ) and an investigation is done in order to assess the presence of seromas, recurrences or other local complications. One year after surgery, computer tomography is performed. The main purpose of the computer tomography is to quantify the presence of seromas.
The study is intended as phase 2 study with the aim of evaluating peritoneal bridging as an alternative to conventional defect closure. If the study shows that bridging does not lead to substantial seroma development, future studies with greater statistical power and other outcome measures will be undertaken.
Conditions
- Hernia, Ventral
- Laparoscopy
- Seroma
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional defect closure
Laparoscopic suturing of the defect prior to placing an intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh
- PROCEDURE
-
Peritoneal bridging
Laparoscopic closure of the defect by using a peritoneal flap prior to placing an intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Karlskoga Hospital
collaborator UNKNOWN - lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-06-30
- Completion
- 2019-12-31
Countries
- Sweden
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair With IPOM
NCT03283982 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Matching Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) and Sublay Mesh to Treat Umbilical Hernia
NCT01201564 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
sIPOM vs pIPOM in Incisional Hernia Patients
NCT05712213 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Treating Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh
NCT02233465 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Prospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic and Open Incisional Hernia Repair: a Multicenter Cohort Study
NCT01280370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic High-Ligation Repair of Indirect Inguinal Hernias in Adults
NCT06120114 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Mesh Position After Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT02177214 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Study to Compare Ventral Incisional Hernia by Laparoscopic vs Open Repair With Mesh
NCT00240188 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Expanding Multi-Layered Partially Resorbable Lightweight Polypropylene Mesh Device (Proceed Ventral Patch® Or Pvp®) For The Treatment of Small and Medium Umbilical Ventral Hernias
NCT01307696 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT03490266 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Versus Hybrid Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT05233020 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pain and Readmission After Lap IPOM vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT05320055 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Study Of A Size Tailored Approach To Repair Umbilical And Epigastric Primary Ventral Hernias
NCT01639118 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Comparison of Whole Mesh and Split Mesh Use in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT05420376 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intraperitoneal Polypropylene Light Weight Wide Pore Soft Mesh Repair for Complex Ventral Hernia.
NCT03994588 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT01420757 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic or Conventional Mesh Repair of Incisional and Umbilical Hernia
NCT00970515 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Mesh/Fixation Concepts for Laparoscopic Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT02233569 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of a New Laparoscopic Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair With Mesh
NCT00138957 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Study of the Use of a Mesh to Prevent Parastomal Hernia After Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection
NCT01722565 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Visible vs. Non-Visible Mesh in Underlay Positon After Repair of Umbilical Hernias
NCT03200405 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Modified "Open Intraperitoneal Mesh" Technique of Incisional Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT01953302 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robot-assisted Ventral Hernia Repair: a Single Institution Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03133715 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Preperitoneal Umbilical Mesh Area
NCT05576753 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D vs 2D HD Laparoscopy in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02367573 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA