Gynecologists' Feedback on ART-Birth Rates
NCT04169295 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 160
Last updated 2024-07-03
Summary
The investigators will examine the hypothesis that women who are given their personalized IVF-prognosis are less likely to overestimate their IVF-live birth rate, as compared to women who do not receive a personalized IVF-prognosis.
Control group: At the time of their fresh embryo transfer couples will receive a document with a photo of their transferred embryo(s) and the number of cryopreserved embryos.
Intervention group: At the time of their fresh embryo transfer couples will receive a document with the following feedback: a photo of their transferred embryo, the number of cryopreserved embryos, the quality rating of the transferred embryo's, and couple's personalized IVF-prognosis (i.e. their chance on a live birth from the current IVF-cycle, including the transfer of fresh and if available cryopreserved embryos, calculated by entering eight background characteristics and five IVF-laboratory results into a prognostic model).
Conditions
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Gynecologists' feedback on ART-Birth rates
At the time of their fresh embryo transfer couples will receive a document with the following feedback: a photo of their transferred embryo, the number of cryopreserved embryos, the quality rating of the transferred embryo's and couple's personalized IVF-prognosis (i.e. their chance on a live birth from the current IVF-cycle, including the transfer of fresh and if available cryopreserved embryos), calculated by entering eight background characteristics and five IVF-laboratory results into a prognostic model.
- OTHER
-
Control group
At the time of their fresh embryo transfer couples will receive a document with the following feedback: a photo of their transferred embryo and the number of cryopreserved embryos
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus
collaborator OTHER -
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Karen Peeraer, Prof. · Leuven University Fertilitycentre
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-11-22
- Primary Completion
- 2022-01-26
- Completion
- 2023-05-17
Countries
- Belgium
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
IUI vs. IVF/ICSI in Women Aged 38-42 Years: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT01992731 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Does Hormonal Luteal Support After Intra-uterine Insemination (IUI) Increase the Pregnancy Rate?
NCT00700492 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Live Birth Rates After Following Long Antagonist Protocol Versus Long Agonist Protocol
NCT03693534 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Clinical and Live Birth Rates After Following Long Antagonist Protocol Versus Classical Antagonist Protocol
NCT03684421 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Subcutaneous Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Gel for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
NCT00827983 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Once Daily vs Twice Daily Administration of Gonadotropins in Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART)
NCT00740025 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Assessment of Impact of Personalized Dosing of Low-dose Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) on in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Outcomes
NCT04852029 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Natural Versus Artificial Cycle for Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer
NCT03642665 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Mild Versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation Treatment for In Vitro Fertilization
NCT00985062 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
What is the Best Preparation for Embryo Transfer in Cryo Cycles: a Natural Cycle or Light Hormonal Stimulation?
NCT00492934 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
There is a Value of Luteinizing Hormone Predictive of in Vitro Fertilization Treatment Outcome in Antagonist Protocols?
NCT02328924 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparing IVF/ICSI Cycle Outcomes of Post Ovulation Ovarian Stimulation Protocol With Elonva Without GnRH Antagonist to Follicular Phase Day 2 Stimulation Fixed Day 5 Antagonist Protocol
NCT06879002 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Hormone Evaluation in Artificial Reproductive Technology
NCT03737253 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predicting Ovarian Response in Artificial Insemination With Low Stimulation
NCT01662180 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) in Natural Cycles or in Natural Cycles Controlled by Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Administration
NCT00809107 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ovarian Response Prediction in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Patients
NCT01206803 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Individual Versus Standard Follicle Stimulating Hormone Dose for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation and Insemination
NCT00374634 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of 2 Ovarian Stimulation Protocols for Women With Low Ovarian Reserve
NCT02128360 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Impact of Personalized Prognostic Counseling on IVF Patient's Experience and Treatment Utilization
NCT06319573 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of GnRH Antagonist vs Agonist Long on IVF Outcome, Peak Estradiol Level,and Duration of Stimulation
NCT01669291 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Registry of Pregnancies Conceived Following Exposure to Ovulation Stimulation Medications
NCT00902382 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Oral Versus Vaginal Progesterone for Luteal Phase Supplementation in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles
NCT04758871 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Progesterone Rise in Agonist Versus Antagonist in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Cycles
NCT01191710 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of the Long GnRH Agonist Protocol and the Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
NCT00417183 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Prolonged Progesterone to Prevent Preterm Birth From IVF - ET
NCT05787509 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4