Eus-giuded Biliary Drainage With Ec-lams vs ERCP as a Primary Intervention for Endoscopic Treatment of Patinets With Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT04099862 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 220
Last updated 2024-08-06
Summary
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the gold standard for the management of jaundice in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction. However, surgically altered anatomy (i.e., Whipple intervention, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Billroth II surgery), periampullary diverticula, gastric outlet obstruction, and malignant obstruction of the lumen determine the failure of the procedure in about 5-10% of cases, requiring alternative methods of decompression. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and surgical bypass are well established alternatives in these patients, but associated with increased morbidity, longer length of hospital stay and higher costs.
EUS guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) through a transduodenal access is an alternative in cases of failed or unfeasible ERCP. EUS-BD has considerably evolved thanks to the development of dedicated devices such as lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS), specifically designed for endoscopic ultrasound procedures. LAMS are made up of braided nitinol that is fully covered with silicone to prevent tissue ingrowth, with wide flanges on both ends to provide anchorage.
Recently, LAMS have been incorporated into a delivery system with an electrocautery mounted on the tip (Hot Axios; Boston Scientific Corp.), which allows the device to be used directly to penetrate the target structure without the need to utilize a 19G needle, a guidewire, and a cystotome for prior dilation. This has been described for drainage of peri-pancreatic fluid collections, common bile duct (CBD), gallbladder, and for creation of gastro-jejuno anastomosis. The biliary drainage procedure performed with the Hot Axios sistem is a fast, one-step procedure that obviates the need accessory exchange and thus potentially reduces the risk of complications.
The procedure has been described as safe and effective with a technical success of 98.2%, clinical success of 96.4%, and low rate of complications 7% (consisting of duodenal perforations, bleeding and transient cholangitis).
Patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction have a higher risk of ERCP failure, related to the difficulty of bile duct cannulation or access to the second duodenal portion due to the presence of a stenosis. This condition could imply the need of more advanced cannulation techniques (such as pre-cut, Double Guide Wire DGW technique, pancreatic septotomy) with consequent higher risk of developing post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Unlike ERCP, an reaching the papilla is not a requisite for a successful EUS-BD. Moreover, since the papilla is not cannulated and the pancreatic duct is not accessed, this is expected to result in a minimal risk of post-procedural pancreatitis (about 0.50%).
The investigators hypothesize that, in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction, EUS guided biliary drainage as first step approach has a lower risk of post-procedural pancreatitis compared to standard ERCP. The investoigators propose to perform a randomized controlled study to test this hypothesis.
Conditions
- DISTAL MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
ERCP
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
- PROCEDURE
-
EUS-BD
Endoscopic UltraSound Biliary Drainage
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2024-04-30
- Completion
- 2024-06-24
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
EUS Biliary Drainage vs. ERCP
NCT03870386 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PROceeding With Advanced Techniques in Case of Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Difficult Biliary Cannulation comparEd With Therapeutic-EUS: the PROMETHEUS Trial
NCT06550973 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Difficult Biliary Cannulation in Patients With Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction: an Underestimated Problem
NCT04709666 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
EUS-guided Biliary Drainage Versus Percutanenous Transhepatic Biliary Darinage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction After Failed ERCP
NCT02103413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Biliary Drainage in Malignant High Grade Biliary Stricture
NCT03530527 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of EUS-guided Biliary Drainage With LAMS for the Treatmentof Patients With Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT04723199 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Process Optimization of Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Patients With Malignant Obstructive Jaundice
NCT03527875 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bile Duct Drainage After ERCP Failure: EUS-BD vs PTBD
NCT05519605 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Biliary Drainage in Patients With Duodenal Metal Stent
NCT02376907 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
EUS-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy Versus ERCP for Primary Biliary Decompression in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT04898777 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) Guided Gallbladder Drainage With Two Months Stent Removal for Acute Cholecystitis: a Prospective Study
NCT05272007 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction
NCT03054987 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sems Placement With and Without Biliary Sphincterectomy in Patients With Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT04805450 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Pre and Intraoperative ERCP in Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones
NCT01046552 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility and Safety of a Dedicated Biliary Stent for Transmural EUS-guided Hepatico-gastrostomy: the FIT Study
NCT04403893 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage in Patients With Inoperable Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction and Failed ERCP: a Prospective Feasibility Multicenter Trial
NCT01889953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial Comparing ERCP vs ERCP and Transmural Gall Bladder Drainage
NCT03921502 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Single-stage ERCP and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: Which to Start With?
NCT06340594 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Elective Endoscopic Gallbladder Treatment: Pilot Study
NCT05723224 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
ERCP With and Without EUS Guided HGS for Bilateral Biliary Decompression in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction
NCT06613945 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ERCP Biliary Cannulation Success Using ESGE Algorithm
NCT06380543 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Optimizing the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Suspected Choledocholithiasis
NCT05141916 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Early Versus Late Cholecystectomy After Clearance of Common Bile Duct Stones
NCT02460315 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Failed Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Stone Extraction: Surgical Interference
NCT05746832 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
EUS-guided Biliary Drainage vs. ERCP Assisted Transpapillary Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT03812250 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA