MedTrace Logo

Prostate Embolization in Chronically Surveyed Patients: Effectiveness of Unilateral vs. Bilateral Embolization

NCT04006431 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2025-12-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Prostate embolization is an alternative treatment to trans urethral prostate resection in the context of benign prostatic hypertrophy. This embolization treatment is also of interest in patients with chronic anuria surveyed in relation to their prostatic hypertrophy for disundation. This survey causes discomfort and urinary tract infection. It is a population with tortuous arteries, a severe atherosclerotic overload making embolizations complex and long. Often, only unilateral embolization is possible. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness in terms of disundation of unilateral vs. bilateral embolization of the prostatic arteries

Conditions

  • Unilateral vs Bilateral Embolization of the Prostate Arteries

Interventions

OTHER

embolization

Retrospective, observational collection with division of patients into two groups according to unilateral or bilateral embolization of the porstatic arteries.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-04-04
Primary Completion
2022-12-31
Completion
2022-12-31

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04006431 on ClinicalTrials.gov