Comparison Between Postoperative Tubular Dressing and a Vacuum Removable Rigid Dressing After Transtibial Amputation

NCT03948087 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2019-05-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Comparison of wound healing, edema level, knee range of motion, rate of revision post falls, device application time, time to prosthetic fit, and cost between postoperative soft dressing and a vacuum removable rigid dressing after unilateral transtibial amputation.

Conditions

  • Amputation Stump
  • Peripheral Vascular Disease With Complications
  • Edema Leg
  • Wound Healing Delayed

Interventions

DEVICE

Vacuum Removable Rigid Dressing (VRRD)

Intra-operative application of device.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Alberta Innovates Health Solutions

    collaborator OTHER
  • Covenant Health, Canada

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Trent I Duchscherer, MSc · Amputee Coordinator Northern Alberta Vascular Center

  • Gerrit B Winkelaar, MD · Divisional Director and Clinical Head of Vascular Surgery for the Edmonton zone

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-05-31
Primary Completion
2020-10-31
Completion
2021-05-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03948087 on ClinicalTrials.gov