Active Versus Passive Motion Device Following Knee Replacement Surgery
NCT02339831 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 110
Last updated 2017-03-20
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine how well an active motion device, Camoped, works compared to a continuous passive motion device, CPM, for rehabilitation after partial or total knee replacement. It is hypothesized that the Camoped active motion device will provide outcomes equal to or superior than the CPM. Patients undergoing either partial or total knee replacement will be given the opportunity to participate. If they elect to participate, preoperative data will be collected including demographics, measures of strength, balance and knee bending, as well as surveys regarding current physical and mental health, as well as knee function. After surgery, patients will be randomly selected to receive either the Camoped or the CPM for use during their rehabilitation. After discharge, participants will be asked to maintain a daily diary tracking their use of the assigned device, as well as their daily pain levels. At a visit 4 weeks after surgery, participants will be asked to complete a series of surveys pertaining to their health and knee function, as well as to perform tests of strength, balance and knee bending. These results will be used to determine if one device produces superior rehabilitation results following total or partial knee replacement surgery.
Conditions
- Knee Arthroplasty
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
CAMOPED
Camoped given after surgery
- DEVICE
-
CPM passive motion device
passive motion device given after surgery
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The New England Baptist Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
Brigham and Women's Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Wolfgang Fitz, MD · Brigham and Women's Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2007-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2010-12-31
- Completion
- 2010-12-31
More Related Trials
-
A Comparison Of Primary TKA Rehabilitation Using A Smart Orthotic Versus Outpatient Physical Therapy
NCT04924205 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Passive, Adaptive, and Active Prosthetic Knees in Persons With Unilateral, Transfemoral Amputation
NCT02219230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison of Fixed and Mobile Bearings
NCT00417859 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Validation and Feasibility in Clinical Practice and Concordance of an Automated System Coupling an RGB-D Camera and a Software Based on Artificial Intelligence for the Measurement of Shoulder Range of Motion for Patients Operated on a Total Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis.
NCT05292157 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Using a Smartphone App to Aid in Functional Mobility Return Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03607461 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
REDAPT Retrospective-Prospective Modular Stem Study
NCT02661620 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Decision Support Strategies for Joint Replacement Surgery
NCT02729831 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Passive Microprocessor-controlled Knees vs. Active Microprocessor-controlled Knees After Transfemoral Amputation
NCT06406491 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Stability of the Medial Pivot Total Knee Prosthesis
NCT02577978 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Validation of Consumer Activity Monitors in Postoperative Total Arthroplasty Patients
NCT03958370 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
A Multicenter, Post-Market Clinical Follow-up Study of Subjects With the REDAPT™ System Monolithic Sleeveless/Sleeved Stem and/or Fully Porous Acetabular Shell With XLPE Liner and/or Modular Shell Components Previously Implanted
NCT03610789 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Motion Analysis of EMP Knee Versus Posterior Stabilized Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis
NCT00967161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness of an Activity-specific Monitoring Device- StepRite
NCT02900781 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Prediction of Outcomes Following Total Knee Replacement- Pilot
NCT04328701 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Physiotherapy for Arthrofibrosis Following Knee Replacement.
NCT05459259 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Assessment of Disability Compensation With the C-LEG COMPACT 2 Knee (Ref. 3C60 et 3C60=ST)
NCT02382991 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Rotating Platform Versus Mobile Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03731676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Midvastus Versus Medial Parapatellar Approach for Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01132378 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RSA and Clinical Comparison of Anatomical and Mechanical Alignment in Total Knee Replacement
NCT02256904 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Versus Standard of Care Surgical Dressing in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03274466 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adductor Under Sartorial Canal Catheter (KTT) Versus Femoral Catheter (KTF) in a Quick Rehabilitation Process After Total Knee Replacement
NCT02873637 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study Measuring the Effects of Patient Data for Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Using an APP Based Sensor for Home Exercise Performance Before and After Operation
NCT05182320 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Weight Loss Intervention Before Total Knee Replacement
NCT01469403 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Transfemoral Amputees When Transitioning From a Mechanical to a Microprocessor Prosthetic Knee
NCT03829202 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does Rehabilitation After Total Hip Or Knee Arthroplasty Work (DRAW2)
NCT04960241 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA