Clinical Outcomes of Small-incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Using Vector Planning Method.
NCT03947944 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 114
Last updated 2019-05-13
Summary
In the past two decades, the femtosecond laser (FSL) technology has been introduced in the corneal refractive surgery filed, and brought a remarkable innovation. It can make tissue dissection through photodisruption and plasma cavitation. Initially, the FSL was used predominantly to make a corneal flap when performing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), which is followed by stromal ablation using excimer laser. A new surgical technique called femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) has been developed that uses only FSL to dissect two interfaces to create refractive lenticule and then remove it, which is very similar with LASIK. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) which is the advanced form of all-in-one FSL refractive technique does not make a corneal flap rather make small incision where the separated refractive lenticule is removed through, and the upper part of the corneal tissue is called cap. Since the clinical outcomes of SMILE were firstly published in 2011, SMILE has been widely used for correction of myopia or myopic astigmatism worldwide. SMILE provides excellent visual outcomes and has advantages including a lesser decrease in corneal sensitivity and absence of flap related complications compared to LASIK.
The vector planning method is newly developed astigmatism correction method, which combines refraction astigmatism in 60 % emphasis and corneal astigmatism in 40 % emphasis. The vectorial difference between corneal astigmatism and refractive cylinder at the corneal plane is ocular residual astigmatism (ORA). In normal eyes treated for myopic astigmatism, the ORA typically ranges from 0.73 to 0.81 D. The eyes with high ORA resulted in inferior clinical outcomes after corneal refractive surgery including LASIK, LASEK, and SMILE. The vector planning method was effective in LASIK according to previous study. Therefore we try to confirm the efficacy of vector planning method in SMILE.
Conditions
- Myopic Astigmatism
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
SMILE using manifest refraction planning
The treatments of astigmatism were planned using either the manifest refraction (manifest refraction group) or the vector planning method (vector planning group). The surgery was performed with standardized techniques with triple centration technique using the 500-KHz VisuMax system (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). The superior cap depth was set as 120 µm, and the length of the side cut was set to 2 mm. Once the anterior (upper) and posterior (lower) planes of the lenticule were defined, the anterior and posterior interfaces were dissected using a microspatula with a blunt circular tip and extracted with microforceps. The integrity of the lenticule was assessed subsequently. The treatment plan for the vector planning group involved a combination of refractive astigmatism with 60 % emphasis and corneal astigmatism with 40 % emphasis.
- PROCEDURE
-
SMILE using vector planning
The treatments of astigmatism were planned using either the manifest refraction (manifest refraction group) or the vector planning method (vector planning group). The surgery was performed with standardized techniques with triple centration technique using the 500-KHz VisuMax system (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). The superior cap depth was set as 120 µm, and the length of the side cut was set to 2 mm. Once the anterior (upper) and posterior (lower) planes of the lenticule were defined, the anterior and posterior interfaces were dissected using a microspatula with a blunt circular tip and extracted with microforceps. The integrity of the lenticule was assessed subsequently. The treatment plan for the vector planning group involved a combination of refractive astigmatism with 60 % emphasis and corneal astigmatism with 40 % emphasis.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Yonsei University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-08-16
- Primary Completion
- 2019-05-07
- Completion
- 2019-05-07
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Association Between ORA and Residual Refractive Astigmatism After SMILE
NCT05604872 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness, Stability and Influence Factors of Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery
NCT07081919 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Femtosecond Laser-assisted Arcuate Incisions Versus Manual Arcuate Incisions Outcomes
NCT04126174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Changes Between Lenticule Extraction and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction
NCT02540785 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Changes Between Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis
NCT02550353 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Femtosecond Laser-assisted Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty
NCT02301598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Surgical Design and Influencing Factors
NCT06229301 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Long-term LASIK Follow up Study
NCT01695642 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
LASIK iDesign vs SMILE
NCT07126756 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Z8 OCT-controlled 2D vs 3D LASIK
NCT04426175 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Femtolaser Assisted Keratoplasty Versus Conventional Keratoplasty
NCT03619434 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of the Wavefront Optimized (WFO) Profile in Non-anterior Astigmatisms
NCT01432834 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction) in the DoD (Department of Defense)
NCT04072289 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intrastromal Fresh Human Corneal Lenticule Implantation Using Smile Surgery for Treatment of Irregular Corneal Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty (new Approach)
NCT04987060 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Femtosecond Laser Assisted Keratotomies for the Management of Corneal Astigmatism
NCT04676451 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SMILE vs. LASIK Using Contoura With Phorcides
NCT05844397 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Corneal Autograft for Limbal Dermoid
NCT03217461 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Toric Trifocal IOL Treatment With High Astigmatism and Hyperopia vs SMILE Enhancement After Trifocal IOL Treatment
NCT04468022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optical Quality, Threshold Target Identification, and Military Target Task Performance After Advanced Keratorefractive Surgery
NCT01097525 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
An Evaluation of LASIK, SMILE and PRK Surgery in Physicians
NCT02576483 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
A Three-Phase Contralateral Comparison of Ray-Tracing Guided LASIK Versus Three Other Refractive Surgery Platforms to Correct Myopia or Myopia With Astigmatism
NCT07201298 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
An Outcomes Study Comparing the Intralase FS 60 to the Intralase iFS When Performing LASIK Surgery for Nearsightedness
NCT01365728 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
LASIK Using the Alcon Allegretto Wavefront-Guided Excimer Laser vs AMO Visx Wavefront-Guided Excimer Laser
NCT01454843 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Topography Guided LASIK With WaveLight® EX500 to SMILE With Zeiss VisuMax
NCT02987660 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Ziemer Femtosecond Versus Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery
NCT03351894 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA