Trial Outcomes & Findings for Behavioral Parent Training for Families With Deaf and Hard of Hearing Preschoolers (NCT NCT03916146)
NCT ID: NCT03916146
Last Updated: 2026-08-03
Results Overview
On the Parenting Young Children (PARYC) scale, parents self-report use of positive parenting strategies by rating 21 specific parenting behaviors from 1 (not at all) to 7 (most of the time) based on how often in the past month they engaged in each parenting behavior. The PARYC Total Score is the sum of three subscale scores (Supporting Positive Behaviors, Setting Limits, Proactive Parenting) and can range from 21-147 with higher scores indicating more positive parenting practices.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
295 participants
6 months after parent baseline
2026-08-03
Participant Flow
Aim 2 participants were recruited for parent interviews and stakeholder focus groups. Participant recruitment for the Aim 4 clinical trial began in June 2021 and ended in April 2024. Recruitment for Aim 5 is still active.
Aim 4 was the clinical trial in this study. Parents of 3 to 6 year-old deaf or hard of hearing children enrolled themselves and their children in the study. After parents and children completed baseline data collection, they were randomized to either the intervention group (71 families=142 parents \& children) or the control group (54 families=108 parents \& children). 18 parents that completed Aim 4 were later enrolled in Aim 5 (not double counted) which makes the total enrollment 295.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Aim 2 Interviews and Focus Groups for Intervention Adaptation
Qualitative data were collected from parents and stakeholders to inform adaptation of the intervention.
|
Aim 4 Behavioral Parent Training
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Aim 4 Control
No intervention
|
Aim 5 Implementation Data
Process data and qualitative data from parents, interventionists, and stakeholders described implementation.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adaptation Phase
STARTED
|
35
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Adaptation Phase
COMPLETED
|
35
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Adaptation Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Effectiveness Phase
STARTED
|
0
|
142
|
108
|
0
|
|
Effectiveness Phase
COMPLETED
|
0
|
124
|
106
|
0
|
|
Effectiveness Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
18
|
2
|
0
|
|
Implementation Phase
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
28
|
|
Implementation Phase
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
26
|
|
Implementation Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Aim 2 Interviews and Focus Groups for Intervention Adaptation
Qualitative data were collected from parents and stakeholders to inform adaptation of the intervention.
|
Aim 4 Behavioral Parent Training
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Aim 4 Control
No intervention
|
Aim 5 Implementation Data
Process data and qualitative data from parents, interventionists, and stakeholders described implementation.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Effectiveness Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
8
|
2
|
0
|
|
Effectiveness Phase
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
10
|
0
|
0
|
|
Implementation Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately. Age is not collected for the stakeholder group.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Aim 4 Behavioral Parent Training
n=142 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Aim 4 Control
n=108 Participants
No intervention
|
Aim 5 Implementation Data
n=10 Participants
Process data and qualitative data from parents, interventionists, and stakeholders described implementation.
|
Total
n=295 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
Aim 2 Interviews and Focus Groups for Intervention Adaptation
n=35 Participants
Qualitative data were collected from parents and stakeholders to inform adaptation of the intervention.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
Parents
|
35.18 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.71 • n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately. Age is not collected for the stakeholder group.
|
35.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.45 • n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately. Age is not collected for the stakeholder group.
|
—
|
35.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.63 • n=145 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately. Age is not collected for the stakeholder group.
|
34.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.98 • n=20 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately. Age is not collected for the stakeholder group.
|
|
Age, Continuous
Children
|
4.99 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.24 • n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately. Age is not collected for the stakeholder group.
|
5.02 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.14 • n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately. Age is not collected for the stakeholder group.
|
—
|
5.01 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.19 • n=125 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately. Age is not collected for the stakeholder group.
|
—
|
|
Age, Continuous
Interventionists
|
—
|
—
|
43.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.02 • n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately. Age is not collected for the stakeholder group.
|
43.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.02 • n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately. Age is not collected for the stakeholder group.
|
—
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Parents · Female
|
70 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
52 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
141 Participants
n=145 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
19 Participants
n=20 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Parents · Male
|
1 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
2 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
4 Participants
n=145 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Children · Female
|
40 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
25 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
65 Participants
n=125 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Children · Male
|
31 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
29 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
60 Participants
n=125 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Interventionists · Female
|
—
|
—
|
10 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
10 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Interventionists · Male
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Stakeholders · Female
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
15 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
15 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Stakeholders · Male
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
3 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
7 Participants
n=145 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
67 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
51 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
138 Participants
n=145 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
20 Participants
n=20 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=145 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Children · Hispanic or Latino
|
5 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
4 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
9 Participants
n=125 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Children · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
65 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
50 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
115 Participants
n=125 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Children · Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
1 Participants
n=125 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Interventionists · Hispanic or Latino
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Interventionists · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
—
|
—
|
10 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
10 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Interventionists · Unknown or Not Reported
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Stakeholders · Hispanic or Latino
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Stakeholders · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
15 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
15 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Stakeholders · Unknown or Not Reported
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=145 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Asian
|
0 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
2 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
2 Participants
n=145 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=145 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Black or African American
|
4 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
4 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
10 Participants
n=145 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · White
|
63 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
46 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
126 Participants
n=145 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
17 Participants
n=20 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · More than one race
|
4 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
2 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
7 Participants
n=145 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=145 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
1 Participants
n=125 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · Asian
|
0 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
1 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
1 Participants
n=125 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=125 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
4 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
7 Participants
n=125 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · White
|
56 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
43 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
99 Participants
n=125 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · More than one race
|
8 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
6 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
14 Participants
n=125 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=71 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
3 Participants
n=125 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Interventionists · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Interventionists · Asian
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Interventionists · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Interventionists · Black or African American
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Interventionists · White
|
—
|
—
|
10 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
10 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Interventionists · More than one race
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Interventionists · Unknown or Not Reported
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
—
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stakeholders · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stakeholders · Asian
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stakeholders · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stakeholders · Black or African American
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stakeholders · White
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
15 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
15 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stakeholders · More than one race
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Stakeholders · Unknown or Not Reported
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 125 families enrolled, but within each family both a parent and a child were enrolled as participants; baseline characteristics are described for parents, children, interventionists, and stakeholders separately.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
142 participants
n=142 Participants
|
108 participants
n=108 Participants
|
10 participants
n=10 Participants
|
295 participants
n=295 Participants
|
35 participants
n=35 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months after parent baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed the primary outcome measure about themselves. 4 parents from the intervention arm withdrew or were lost-to-follow-up by the 6-month follow-up appointment (primary endpoint).
On the Parenting Young Children (PARYC) scale, parents self-report use of positive parenting strategies by rating 21 specific parenting behaviors from 1 (not at all) to 7 (most of the time) based on how often in the past month they engaged in each parenting behavior. The PARYC Total Score is the sum of three subscale scores (Supporting Positive Behaviors, Setting Limits, Proactive Parenting) and can range from 21-147 with higher scores indicating more positive parenting practices.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=67 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parenting Young Children (PARYC) Scale Total Score
|
124.43 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.98
|
116.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from completion of baseline assessment to up to 36 months after baseline assessmentPopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about their own parenting behaviors.
While the primary study outcome is PARYC Total scores 6 months after baseline, a secondary outcome is PARYC Total scores over time within and between study arms for up to 3 years. On the PARYC, parents self-report use of positive parenting strategies by rating 21 specific parenting behaviors from 1 (not at all) to 7 (most of the time) based on how often in the past month they engaged in each parenting behavior. The PARYC Total Score is the sum of three subscale scores (Supporting Positive Behaviors, Setting Limits, Proactive Parenting) and can range from 21-147 with higher scores indicating more positive parenting practices.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Total Scores Over Time
Baseline
|
116.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.83
|
114.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.27
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Total Scores Over Time
6 months after baseline
|
124.43 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.98
|
116.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.73
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Total Scores Over Time
12 months after baseline
|
123.34 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.85
|
116.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.39
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Total Scores Over Time
18 months after baseline
|
125.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.03
|
116.76 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.33
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Total Scores Over Time
24 months after baseline
|
118.68 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.42
|
117.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.21
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Total Scores Over Time
30 months after baseline
|
127.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.66
|
120.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.02
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Total Scores Over Time
36 months after baseline
|
127.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.01
|
114.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.40
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from completion of baseline assessment to up to 36 months after baseline assessmentPopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about their own parenting behaviors.
On the PARYC, parents self-report use of positive parenting strategies by rating 21 specific parenting behaviors from 1 (not at all) to 7 (most of the time) based on how often in the past month they engaged in each parenting behavior. The PARYC Supporting Positive Behavior subscale sums scores from 7 items describing this positive parenting strategy. The subscale score can range from 7-49 with higher scores indicating more use of strategies to support their child's positive behavior.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Supporting Positive Behavior Subscale Scores Over Time
Baseline
|
40.35 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.45
|
40.74 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.16
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Supporting Positive Behavior Subscale Scores Over Time
6 months after baseline
|
41.72 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.57
|
40.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.48
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Supporting Positive Behavior Subscale Scores Over Time
12 months after baseline
|
41.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.79
|
40.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.83
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Supporting Positive Behavior Subscale Scores Over Time
18 months after baseline
|
42.66 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.07
|
39.43 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.93
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Supporting Positive Behavior Subscale Scores Over Time
24 months after baseline
|
39.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.35
|
40.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.01
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Supporting Positive Behavior Subscale Scores Over Time
30 months after baseline
|
42.14 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.21
|
41.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.16
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Supporting Positive Behavior Subscale Scores Over Time
36 months after baseline
|
42.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.95
|
38.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from completion of baseline assessment to up to 36 months after baseline assessmentPopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about their own parenting behaviors.
On the PARYC, parents self-report use of positive parenting strategies by rating 21 specific parenting behaviors from 1 (not at all) to 7 (most of the time) based on how often in the past month they engaged in each parenting behavior. The PARYC Setting Limits subscale sums scores from 7 items describing this positive parenting strategy. The subscale score can range from 7-49 with higher scores indicating more use of strategies to set limits.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Setting Limits Subscale Scores Over Time
30 months after baseline
|
43.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.97
|
40.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.88
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Setting Limits Subscale Scores Over Time
Baseline
|
37.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.14
|
36.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.13
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Setting Limits Subscale Scores Over Time
6 months after baseline
|
40.35 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.80
|
37.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.06
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Setting Limits Subscale Scores Over Time
12 months after baseline
|
40.43 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.37
|
37.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.22
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Setting Limits Subscale Scores Over Time
18 months after baseline
|
40.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.49
|
38.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.19
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Setting Limits Subscale Scores Over Time
24 months after baseline
|
39.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.50
|
37.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.40
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Setting Limits Subscale Scores Over Time
36 months after baseline
|
42.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.37
|
38.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.74
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from completion of baseline assessment to up to 36 months after baseline assessmentPopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about their own parenting behaviors.
On the PARYC, parents self-report use of positive parenting strategies by rating 21 specific parenting behaviors from 1 (not at all) to 7 (most of the time) based on how often in the past month they engaged in each parenting behavior. The PARYC Proactive Parenting subscale sums scores from 7 items describing this positive parenting strategy. The subscale score can range from 7-49 with higher scores indicating more use of proactive parenting strategies.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Proactive Parenting Subscale Scores Over Time
30 months after baseline
|
42.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.34
|
39.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.85
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Proactive Parenting Subscale Scores Over Time
Baseline
|
39.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.36
|
36.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.89
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Proactive Parenting Subscale Scores Over Time
6 months after baseline
|
42.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.63
|
37.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.10
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Proactive Parenting Subscale Scores Over Time
12 months after baseline
|
41.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.99
|
38.77 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.36
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Proactive Parenting Subscale Scores Over Time
18 months after baseline
|
42.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.13
|
39.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.40
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Proactive Parenting Subscale Scores Over Time
24 months after baseline
|
39.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.27
|
38.86 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.41
|
|
Change in Parenting Young Children Scale (PARYC) Proactive Parenting Subscale Scores Over Time
36 months after baseline
|
43.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.28
|
38.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.37
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from completion of baseline assessment to up to 36 months after baseline assessmentPopulation: Parents in Aim 4 completed the CBCL about their child enrolled in the study.
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Problems T-scores, including responses to all items. Parents of children ages 3-5 completed the CBCL/1-5 and parents of children ages 6 and up completed the CBCL/6-18. T-scores have a population mean of 50 with a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicate higher levels of behavioral problems. On the CBCL/1-5 and CBCL/6-18, T-scores less than 60 are in the normal range. For children ages 3-5 years, T-scores from 60-63 are in the at-risk/borderline range and T-scores 64 and above are in the clinical range. For children ages 6 years and up, T-scores from 60-64 are in the at-risk/borderline range and T-scores 65 and above are in the clinical range.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Problems T-Score
Baseline
|
46.99 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.18
|
48.13 T-score
Standard Deviation 12.70
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Problems T-Score
6 months after baseline
|
46.12 T-score
Standard Deviation 9.96
|
49.13 T-score
Standard Deviation 11.53
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Problems T-Score
12 months after baseline
|
46.47 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.26
|
47.92 T-score
Standard Deviation 11.50
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Problems T-Score
18 months after baseline
|
45.78 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.21
|
48.00 T-score
Standard Deviation 13.80
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Problems T-Score
24 months after baseline
|
47.79 T-score
Standard Deviation 9.89
|
52.00 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.68
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Problems T-Score
30 months after baseline
|
47.57 T-score
Standard Deviation 11.13
|
49.00 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.73
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Problems T-Score
36 months after baseline
|
50.69 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.84
|
49.77 T-score
Standard Deviation 11.62
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from completion of baseline assessment to up to 36 months after baseline assessmentPopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about their child enrolled in the study
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Internalizing Problems subscale T-scores. Parents of children ages 3-5 completed the CBCL/1-5 (99 items) and parents of children ages 6 and up completed the CBCL/6-18 (113 items). T-scores have a population mean of 50 with a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicate higher levels of internalizing behavior problems. T-scores less than 60 are in the normal range. For children ages 3-5 years, T-scores from 60-63 are in the at-risk/borderline range and T-scores 64 and above are in the clinical range. For children ages 6 years and up, T-scores from 60-64 are in the at-risk/borderline range and T-scores 65 and above are in the clinical range.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Internalizing Problems T-Score
Baseline
|
45.34 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.57
|
46.91 T-score
Standard Deviation 11.46
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Internalizing Problems T-Score
6 months after baseline
|
43.91 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.63
|
47.52 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.40
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Internalizing Problems T-Score
12 months after baseline
|
43.77 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.34
|
47.60 T-score
Standard Deviation 11.07
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Internalizing Problems T-Score
18 months after baseline
|
43.74 T-score
Standard Deviation 9.52
|
46.32 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.95
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Internalizing Problems T-Score
24 months after baseline
|
44.43 T-score
Standard Deviation 9.50
|
47.50 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.05
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Internalizing Problems T-Score
30 months after baseline
|
44.93 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.69
|
44.75 T-score
Standard Deviation 8.79
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Internalizing Problems T-Score
36 months after baseline
|
47.85 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.95
|
45.46 T-score
Standard Deviation 9.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from completion of baseline assessment to up to 36 months after baseline assessmentPopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about their child enrolled in the study
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Externalizing Problems subscale T-scores. Parents of children ages 3-5 completed the CBCL/1-5 (99 items) and parents of children ages 6 and up completed the CBCL/6-18 (113 items). T-scores have a population mean of 50 with a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicate higher levels of externalizing behavioral problems. T-scores less than 60 are in the normal range. For children ages 3-5 years, T-scores from 60-63 are in the at-risk/borderline range and T-scores 64 and above are in the clinical range. For children ages 6 years and up, T-scores from 60-64 are in the at-risk/borderline range and T-scores 65 and above are in the clinical range.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Externalizing Problems T-Score
Baseline
|
46.45 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.00
|
47.61 T-score
Standard Deviation 12.21
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Externalizing Problems T-Score
6 months after baseline
|
45.40 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.26
|
48.59 T-score
Standard Deviation 11.80
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Externalizing Problems T-Score
12 months after baseline
|
45.95 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.85
|
47.17 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.77
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Externalizing Problems T-Score
18 months after baseline
|
45.16 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.02
|
46.95 T-score
Standard Deviation 13.88
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Externalizing Problems T-Score
24 months after baseline
|
48.50 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.35
|
50.13 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.51
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Externalizing Problems T-Score
30 months after baseline
|
45.79 T-score
Standard Deviation 11.57
|
47.88 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.21
|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Externalizing Problems T-Score
36 months after baseline
|
48.54 T-score
Standard Deviation 11.22
|
49.62 T-score
Standard Deviation 10.50
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from completion of baseline assessment to up to 36 months after baseline assessment.Population: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about themselves. 1 parent in the Behavioral Parent Training arm did not complete this measure at baseline.
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Total Score combines the scores for the self-efficacy and satisfaction subscales, yielding a total score for parent sense of competence. Possible scores range from 16-96 with higher scores indicating higher levels of parent sense of competence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=70 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Total Score
36 months after baseline
|
38.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.15
|
39.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.66
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Total Score
30 months after baseline
|
37.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.57
|
39.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.87
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Total Score
Baseline
|
42.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.61
|
44.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.14
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Total Score
6 months after baseline
|
41.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.31
|
43.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.89
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Total Score
12 months after baseline
|
40.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.77
|
42.94 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.65
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Total Score
18 months after baseline
|
40.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.33
|
40.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.82
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Total Score
24 months after baseline
|
39.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.27
|
40.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.55
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from completion of baseline assessment to up to 36 months after baseline assessmentPopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about themselves
The Parent Sense of Competence Scale Self-efficacy subscale score measures parents' self-efficacy in the parenting role. Possible scores range from 7-42 with higher scores indicating higher levels of parent self-efficacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=70 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Self-efficacy Score
Baseline
|
18.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.88
|
19.37 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.08
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Self-efficacy Score
6 months after baseline
|
17.42 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.97
|
18.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.77
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Self-efficacy Score
12 months after baseline
|
17.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.24
|
18.40 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.46
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Self-efficacy Score
18 months after baseline
|
17.52 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.94
|
16.99 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.45
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Self-efficacy Score
24 months after baseline
|
16.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.67
|
17.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.82
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Self-efficacy Score
30 months after baseline
|
15.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.73
|
16.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.97
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Self-efficacy Score
36 months after baseline
|
15.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.56
|
16.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.74
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from completion of baseline assessment to up to 36 months after baseline assessmentPopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about themselves
The Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Satisfaction subscale measures parent satisfaction with the parenting role. Possible scores range from 9-54 with higher scores indicating higher levels of parent satisfaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=70 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Satisfaction Score
Baseline
|
24.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.71
|
24.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.33
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Satisfaction Score
6 months after baseline
|
23.61 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.02
|
25.01 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.75
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Satisfaction Score
12 months after baseline
|
23.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.13
|
24.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.68
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Satisfaction Score
18 months after baseline
|
22.99 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.13
|
23.61 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.14
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Satisfaction Score
24 months after baseline
|
23.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.82
|
23.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.26
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Satisfaction Score
30 months after baseline
|
22.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.30
|
22.75 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.77
|
|
Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSCS) Satisfaction Score
36 months after baseline
|
21.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.27
|
22.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from completion of baseline assessment to up to 36 months after baseline assessmentPopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about themselves.
The Beck Depression Inventory-II is a self-report measure of depressive symptoms. For each of 21 items, respondents select the response option (scored 0, 1, 2, or 3) closest to their own experience over the past week. Scores can range from 0-63 with higher scores indicating more/more severe depressive symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
36 months after baseline
|
4.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.65
|
4.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.03
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Baseline
|
8.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.74
|
8.94 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.70
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
6 months after baseline
|
7.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.65
|
9.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.82
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
12 months after baseline
|
5.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.71
|
8.79 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.11
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
18 months after baseline
|
4.72 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.84
|
6.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.11
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
24 months after baseline
|
4.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.79
|
5.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.53
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
30 months after baseline
|
6.07 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.10
|
4.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Parent Positive Control score reflects parents' use of positive behaviors (e.g., use of explanation, open-ended prompting, praise) in interacting with their child. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating more use of positive behaviors by parents.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=69 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=51 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Positive Control
Baseline
|
5.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
5.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Positive Control
6 months after baseline
|
5.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
5.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Positive Control
12 months after baseline
|
5.42 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.83
|
5.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Positive Control
18 months after baseline
|
5.42 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
4.82 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Parent Negative Control score reflects parents' use of negative behaviors (e.g., use of physical control, criticism) in interacting with their child. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating more use of negative behaviors by parents.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=70 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=52 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Negative Control
Baseline
|
2.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.37
|
2.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Negative Control
6 months after baseline
|
2.04 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
2.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Negative Control
12 months after baseline
|
2.42 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.80
|
2.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Negative Control
18 months after baseline
|
1.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
2.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Parent Positive Affect score reflects parents' positive affect (e.g., warmth, smiling, laughing) in interacting with their child. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of positive affect observed in parents.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=70 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=52 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Positive Affect
Baseline
|
6.04 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
6.16 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Positive Affect
6 months after baseline
|
5.98 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
6.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Positive Affect
12 months after baseline
|
5.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.62
|
5.07 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Positive Affect
18 months after baseline
|
6.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
4.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Parent Negative Affect score reflects parents' negative affect (e.g., rejection, frowning, cold/harsh voice) in interacting with their child. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of negative affect observed in parents.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=70 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=52 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Negative Affect
Baseline
|
1.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
1.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Negative Affect
6 months after baseline
|
1.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
1.76 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Negative Affect
12 months after baseline
|
1.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
2.80 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Negative Affect
18 months after baseline
|
1.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
3.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.79
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Child Positive Affect score reflects children's positive affect (e.g., warmth, smiling, laughing) in interacting with their parent. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of positive affect observed in children.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=69 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=52 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Positive Affect
Baseline
|
6.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
6.16 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Positive Affect
6 months after baseline
|
6.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
6.28 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Positive Affect
12 months after baseline
|
5.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
5.97 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Positive Affect
18 months after baseline
|
6.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.40
|
5.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Child Negative Affect score reflects children's negative affect (e.g., rejection, cold/harsh voice tones) in interacting with their parent. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of negative affect observed in children.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=70 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=51 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Negative Affect
Baseline
|
1.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
1.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Negative Affect
6 months after baseline
|
1.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
1.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Negative Affect
12 months after baseline
|
1.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
1.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Negative Affect
18 months after baseline
|
1.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.40
|
2.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.75
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Child On-Task score reflects parents' children's initiative and persistence in engaged with the assigned task while interacting with their parent. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of children's observed on-task behavior.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=69 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=52 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child On-Task
Baseline
|
5.07 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
5.33 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child On-Task
6 months after baseline
|
5.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.48
|
5.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child On-Task
12 months after baseline
|
5.19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
4.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child On-Task
18 months after baseline
|
5.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
|
4.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Child Noncompliance score reflects children's level of compliance while interacting with their parent. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of child noncompliance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=68 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=52 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Noncompliance
6 months after baseline
|
1.43 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
1.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Noncompliance
Baseline
|
1.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
1.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Noncompliance
12 months after baseline
|
1.39 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
1.57 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Noncompliance
18 months after baseline
|
1.58 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
1.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Conflict score reflects parent-child dyads' level of minor or major disagreement (e.g., shared negative affect, arguing, tussling over toy, etc.) in interacting with each other. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of conflict.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=68 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=50 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Conflict
Baseline
|
1.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
1.18 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Conflict
6 months after baseline
|
1.16 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
1.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Conflict
12 months after baseline
|
1.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
1.47 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Conflict
18 months after baseline
|
1.33 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
1.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Annually from 12 months after baseline up to 36 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about themselves
The Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) is a self-report measure of parents' motivation to change parenting behaviors. The Total Score is the sum of the 3 subscales (Desire for Change, Readiness to Change, Perceived Ability to Change). Total scores can range from 25 to 125 with higher scores indicated higher motivation to change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Total Score
Baseline
|
76.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.26
|
83.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.83
|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Total Score
12 months after baseline
|
67.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.28
|
74.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.92
|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Total Score
24 months after baseline
|
66.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.78
|
63.19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.55
|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Total Score
36 months after baseline
|
59.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.32
|
61.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Annually from 12 months after baseline up to 36 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about themselves
The Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) is a self-report measure of parents' motivation to change parenting behaviors. The Desire for Change subscale includes 7 items measuring parents' desire for their child's behaviors to change. Subscale scores can range from 7 to 35 with higher scores indicated higher desire.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Desire for Change Subscale
36 months after baseline
|
15.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.01
|
14.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.71
|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Desire for Change Subscale
24 months after baseline
|
17.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.42
|
13.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.19
|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Desire for Change Subscale
Baseline
|
16.35 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.46
|
17.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.25
|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Desire for Change Subscale
12 months after baseline
|
15.14 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.09
|
15.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.75
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Annually from 12 months after baseline up to 36 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about themselves
The Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) is a self-report measure of parents' motivation to change parenting behaviors. The Readiness to Change subscale includes 14 items measuring parents' readiness to change their parenting behaviors. Subscale scores can range from 14 to 70 with higher scores indicated higher readiness to change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Readiness to Change Subscale
Baseline
|
47.39 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.24
|
52.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.77
|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Readiness to Change Subscale
12 months after baseline
|
40.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.27
|
46.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.70
|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Readiness to Change Subscale
24 months after baseline
|
37.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.02
|
39.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.88
|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Readiness to Change Subscale
36 months after baseline
|
33.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.33
|
36.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.83
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Annually from 12 months after baseline up to 36 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about themselves
The Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) is a self-report measure of parents' motivation to change parenting behaviors. The Perceived Ability to Change subscale includes 4 items measuring parents' perceived ability to change their parenting behaviors. Subscale scores can range from 4 to 20 with higher scores indicated higher perceived ability to change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Perceived Ability to Change Subscale
Baseline
|
13.10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.80
|
13.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.03
|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Perceived Ability to Change Subscale
12 months after baseline
|
11.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.55
|
12.75 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.50
|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Perceived Ability to Change Subscale
24 months after baseline
|
11.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.88
|
10.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.74
|
|
Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) Perceived Ability to Change Subscale
36 months after baseline
|
10.69 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.28
|
10.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 12 months from completion of baseline assessment up to 36 months after baseline assessmentPopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about their child enrolled in the study. 1 parent in the Behavioral Parent Training arm did not complete this measure at the 12-month timepoint.
The Hearing Aid Adherence Questionnaire is a parent-report measure assessing their child's use of their hearing aids. This measure includes a list of 9 situations (e.g., riding in a car, being at someone else's house) for which parents rate the frequency of their child's hearing aid use on a Likert-type scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always). The scale score is the mean of the parent's responses to each item. Scores can range from 1-5 and higher scores indicate more hearing aid use in more situations.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hearing Aid Adherence Questionnaire
Baseline
|
4.47 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
4.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
|
Hearing Aid Adherence Questionnaire
12 months after baseline
|
4.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
4.42 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
|
Hearing Aid Adherence Questionnaire
24 months after baseline
|
3.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
3.87 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.42
|
|
Hearing Aid Adherence Questionnaire
36 months after baseline
|
4.24 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.48
|
3.79 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.49
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Annually from 6 months after baseline up to 30 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 who were randomized to the Behavioral Parent Training arm completed this measure about the intervention. 7 parents in the Behavioral Parent Training arm at the 6-month timepoint did not complete this measure. Parents randomized to the Control arm were not administered this measure because they did not receive the intervention being rated.
The Therapy Attitude Inventory is a parent-report measure evaluating parent satisfaction with therapy (developed for use with Parent-Child Interaction Therapy; in this study used to assess satisfaction with the adapted Behavioral Parent Training intervention). Parents rate their agreement with 10 items using a Likert-type scale (1-5) for each item. Scores can range from 10 to 50 with higher scores indicating more satisfaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=60 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Therapy Attitude Inventory (TAI)
6 months after baseline
|
36.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.49
|
—
|
|
Therapy Attitude Inventory (TAI)
18 months after baseline
|
39.97 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.99
|
—
|
|
Therapy Attitude Inventory (TAI)
30 months after baseline
|
40.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.62
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Annually from baseline through up to 36 months.Population: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about their child. 6 parents in the Behavioral Parent Training arm and 4 parents in the Control arm did not complete this measure at baseline because they stated that their child was non-verbal and not producing spoken words.
The MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories - Words \& Sentences - Words Produced section assesses the number of words currently spontaneously used by a child via parent-report. Raw scores can range from 0-680 with higher scores indicating more words produced by a child.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=65 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=50 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories - Words & Sentences - Words Produced (Raw Score)
Baseline
|
568.18 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 184.12
|
540.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 214.70
|
|
MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories - Words & Sentences - Words Produced (Raw Score)
12 months after baseline
|
643.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 98.08
|
593.35 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 180.75
|
|
MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories - Words & Sentences - Words Produced (Raw Score)
24 months after baseline
|
661.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 48.32
|
635.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 162.65
|
|
MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories - Words & Sentences - Words Produced (Raw Score)
36 months after baseline
|
672.10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.29
|
678.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.35
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Annually from baseline through up to 36 months.Population: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 completed this measure about their child. 6 parents in the Behavioral Parent Training arm and 4 parents in the Control arm did not complete this measure at baseline because they stated that their child was non-verbal and not producing spoken words.
The MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories - Words \& Sentences - Sentence Complexity Score assesses grammatical development by having parents review 37 pairs of sentences. For each pair, the parent selects the sentence that sounds more like their child's speech. One point is added for each selection of the more complex sentence in a pair. Sentence Complexity Scores can range from 0-37 with higher scores indicating higher levels of grammatical development.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=65 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=50 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories - Words & Sentences - Sentence Complexity Score
Baseline
|
24.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.09
|
22.98 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.43
|
|
MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories - Words & Sentences - Sentence Complexity Score
12 months after baseline
|
29.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.48
|
28.75 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.75
|
|
MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories - Words & Sentences - Sentence Complexity Score
24 months after baseline
|
32.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.89
|
32.33 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.51
|
|
MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories - Words & Sentences - Sentence Complexity Score
36 months after baseline
|
33.80 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.37
|
34.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.37
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Annually from baseline assessment through up to 36 months after baselinePopulation: Children enrolled in Aim 4 completed this assessment. Initially this measure was first administered at the 12 month after baseline timepoint, but part way through the study it was also added to baseline measures. Children who were unable to participate in the assessment due to developmental or behavioral limitations or being lost to follow-up do not have results.
The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) Standard Score is a measure of a child's receptive language. The PPVT assesses receptive vocabulary by requiring children to identify one of four pictures corresponding to a spoken word. Administration follows standardized basal and ceiling procedures. Standard scores are derived with the standard score metric (M = 100, SD = 15) and higher scores indicate higher levels of receptive vocabulary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=60 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=45 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) Standard Score
Baseline
|
92.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.51
|
91.32 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.47
|
|
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) Standard Score
12 months after baseline
|
90.80 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.57
|
92.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.67
|
|
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) Standard Score
24 months after baseline
|
87.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.74
|
88.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.39
|
|
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) Standard Score
36 months after baseline
|
87.40 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.18
|
96.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.34
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Annually from baseline through up to 36 months after baselinePopulation: Children enrolled in Aim 4 completed this assessment. Initially this measure was first administered at the 12 month after baseline timepoint, but part way through the study it was also added to baseline measures. Children who were unable to participate in the assessment due to developmental or behavioral limitations or being lost to follow-up do not have results.
The Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals - Core Language Score (CELF-CLS) assesses language ability. The CELF is an individually administered standardized language assessment that assesses performance across multiple expressive and receptive language subtests. Age-appropriate versions of the CELF were administered (i.e., the CELF-Preschool-3 for children ages 3 and 4 years; the CELF-5 for children ages 5 years and up). On both versions of the CELF, the CLS is a composite score derived from subsets of language subtests appropriate for the child's age, estimating overall language ability by combining receptive and expressive language skills. The CLS standard score has a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Interpretation of CLS standard scores: 130 or higher = very superior; 120-129 = superior; 110-119 = high average; 90-109 = average; 80-89 = low average; 70-79 = moderately low; less than 70 = very low. Higher scores indicate higher levels of language ability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=52 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=38 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF) - Core Language Score (Standard Scores)
Baseline
|
89.06 standard score
Standard Deviation 18.61
|
96.14 standard score
Standard Deviation 16.35
|
|
Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF) - Core Language Score (Standard Scores)
12 months after baseline
|
88.10 standard score
Standard Deviation 18.51
|
93.21 standard score
Standard Deviation 19.88
|
|
Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF) - Core Language Score (Standard Scores)
24 months after baseline
|
82.25 standard score
Standard Deviation 14.60
|
91.46 standard score
Standard Deviation 21.05
|
|
Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF) - Core Language Score (Standard Scores)
36 months after baseline
|
83.00 standard score
Standard Deviation 16.64
|
93.20 standard score
Standard Deviation 19.15
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months beginning with baseline through up to 36 monthsPopulation: Children enrolled in Aim 4. This measure was initially administered beginning at 12 months after baseline, but part way through the study it was also included as a baseline measure.
The Beginner's Intelligibility Test (BIT) assesses the intelligibility of 10 sentences repeated by a child in response to the test administrator speaking the sentence and showing a picture illustrating the sentence. The child's spoken sentences are audiorecorded and played for 3 naive listeners who write down what they heard. The BIT score is calculated as the mean percentage of opportunity words (the original words spoken by the test administrator) identified across the 3 listeners. Scores can range from 0 to 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=56 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=41 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Beginner's Intelligibility Test (BIT)
Baseline
|
50.97 percentage of opportunity words
Standard Deviation 33.71
|
62.08 percentage of opportunity words
Standard Deviation 29.10
|
|
Beginner's Intelligibility Test (BIT)
12 months after baseline
|
62.42 percentage of opportunity words
Standard Deviation 24.76
|
71.06 percentage of opportunity words
Standard Deviation 25.52
|
|
Beginner's Intelligibility Test (BIT)
24 months after baseline
|
80.07 percentage of opportunity words
Standard Deviation 25.87
|
75.86 percentage of opportunity words
Standard Deviation 18.08
|
|
Beginner's Intelligibility Test (BIT)
36 months after baseline
|
83.14 percentage of opportunity words
Standard Deviation 18.62
|
90.32 percentage of opportunity words
Standard Deviation 7.09
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Annually from baseline through up to 36 monthsPopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 respond about their child
The Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale - Bonding/Attachment to Hearing Device domain of the MAIS assesses to what degree a child seeks out or depends on their hearing device. Two interview questions are asked of the parent (one about child wearing the device, one about child's response when the device is non-functional) and parent responses are coded from 0 (Never) to 4 (Always). The sum of the coded responses is the score, which can range from 0-8, with higher scores indicating better bonding/attachment to the hearing device.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=70 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) - Bonding/Attachment to Hearing Device Domain
Baseline
|
5.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
5.11 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
|
Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) - Bonding/Attachment to Hearing Device Domain
12 months after baseline
|
5.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.70
|
5.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.90
|
|
Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) - Bonding/Attachment to Hearing Device Domain
24 months after baseline
|
4.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.95
|
5.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.55
|
|
Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) - Bonding/Attachment to Hearing Device Domain
36 months after baseline
|
5.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.24
|
6.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.34
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Annually from baseline through up to 36 months after baselinePopulation: Children enrolled in Aim 4 completed this assessment. Initially this measure was first administered at the 12 month after baseline timepoint, but part way through the study it was also added to baseline measures. Children who were unable to participate in the assessment due to developmental or behavioral limitations or being lost to follow-up do not have results.
The Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals - Expressive Language Index (CELF-ELI) assesses expressive language. The CELF is an individually administered standardized language assessment that assesses performance across multiple expressive and receptive language subtests. Age-appropriate versions of the CELF were administered (i.e., the CELF-Preschool-3 for children ages 3 and 4 years; the CELF-5 for children ages 5 years and up). On both versions of the CELF, the ELI is a composite score derived from subsets of expressive language subtests appropriate for the child's age. The ELI standard score has a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Interpretation of ELI standard scores: 130 or higher = very superior; 120-129 = superior; 110-119 = high average; 90-109 = average; 80-89 = low average; 70-79 = moderately low; less than 70 = very low. Higher scores indicate higher levels of expressive language ability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=52 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=37 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF) - Expressive Language Index (Standard Scores)
Baseline
|
87.49 standard score
Standard Deviation 19.90
|
93.57 standard score
Standard Deviation 16.43
|
|
Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF) - Expressive Language Index (Standard Scores)
12 months after baseline
|
86.37 standard score
Standard Deviation 20.28
|
91.27 standard score
Standard Deviation 19.99
|
|
Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF) - Expressive Language Index (Standard Scores)
24 months after baseline
|
80.75 standard score
Standard Deviation 12.86
|
87.92 standard score
Standard Deviation 20.57
|
|
Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF) - Expressive Language Index (Standard Scores)
36 months after baseline
|
78.75 standard score
Standard Deviation 16.93
|
93.10 standard score
Standard Deviation 20.87
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Parent Responsiveness score reflects parents' responsiveness (verbal or behavioral) to their child's questions, comments, and behaviors in interacting with their child. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of parent responsiveness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=70 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=52 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Responsiveness
18 months after baseline
|
6.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
6.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Responsiveness
Baseline
|
5.95 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
6.01 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Responsiveness
6 months after baseline
|
6.32 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
6.10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Responsiveness
12 months after baseline
|
6.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
6.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Parent On-Task score reflects parents' initiative and persistence in engaging with the assigned task while interacting with their child. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of parents' observed on-task behavior.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=70 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=52 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent On-Task
Baseline
|
6.01 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
5.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent On-Task
6 months after baseline
|
6.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
5.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent On-Task
12 months after baseline
|
5.39 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
5.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent On-Task
18 months after baseline
|
5.75 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
5.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Parent Verbalizations score reflects parents' amount of verbalizations in interacting with their child. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of parent verbalizations.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=70 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=52 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Verbalizations
12 months after baseline
|
4.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
5.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Verbalizations
Baseline
|
5.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
5.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Verbalizations
6 months after baseline
|
5.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
5.05 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Parent Verbalizations
18 months after baseline
|
5.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
5.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).y
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Child Responsiveness score reflects children's responsiveness (verbal or behavioral) to their parent's questions, comments, and behaviors in interacting with their parent. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of child responsiveness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=69 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=52 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Responsiveness
Baseline
|
5.32 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
5.35 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Responsiveness
6 months after baseline
|
5.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
5.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Responsiveness
12 months after baseline
|
5.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.45
|
5.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Responsiveness
18 months after baseline
|
5.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
5.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Child Autonomy score reflects children's autonomy/independence (e.g., leads and controls task - but does not include off-task behaviors) in interacting with their parent. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of child autonomy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=68 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=51 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Autonomy
Baseline
|
3.87 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
4.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.70
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Autonomy
6 months after baseline
|
3.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
4.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.82
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Autonomy
12 months after baseline
|
4.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.93
|
4.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Autonomy
18 months after baseline
|
3.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.62
|
3.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Child Activity score reflects children's level of physical movements (e.g., moving arms, jumping up and down) in interacting with their parent. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of child activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=68 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=51 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Activity
Baseline
|
5.10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
5.18 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Activity
6 months after baseline
|
4.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
5.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Activity
12 months after baseline
|
4.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
5.18 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Activity
18 months after baseline
|
4.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
4.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Child Verbalizations score reflects children's amount of verbalizations in interacting with their parent. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of child verbalizations.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=68 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=51 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Verbalizations
Baseline
|
4.07 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
4.10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Verbalizations
6 months after baseline
|
4.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
4.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Verbalizations
12 months after baseline
|
4.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
5.07 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Child Verbalizations
18 months after baseline
|
4.58 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
4.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Reciprocity score reflects parent-child dyads' level of reciprocity (e.g., shared positive affect, eye contact, turn-taking quality) in interacting with each other. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of reciprocity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=68 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=50 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Reciprocity
Baseline
|
4.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.37
|
5.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Reciprocity
6 months after baseline
|
5.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.30
|
5.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.30
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Reciprocity
12 months after baseline
|
5.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.81
|
5.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.46
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Reciprocity
18 months after baseline
|
5.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
5.33 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Every 6 months from baseline to up to 18 months after baselinePopulation: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 and their child enrolled in the study. Missing results are due to loss-to-follow up, child being unable to participate in parent-child interaction activity, or technological problems (audio, video, or unreadable files).
The Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) is an observational measure of parent-child interaction quality. Scores are given by trained observers reviewing video recordings of parents and children interacting in assigned tasks. The Cooperation score reflects parent-child dyads' level of explicit agreement/discussion of how to complete the task together (e.g., "Shall we do this next?" "Yes") in interacting with each other. Scores range from 1 (no evidence) to 7 (consistent occurrence), with higher scores indicating higher levels of cooperation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=67 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=50 Participants
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Cooperation
Baseline
|
3.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
|
3.68 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.82
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Cooperation
6 months after baseline
|
3.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.92
|
3.61 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Cooperation
12 months after baseline
|
2.68 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
3.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
|
Parent Child Interaction System (PARCHISY) - Cooperation
18 months after baseline
|
3.75 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
4.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Parent's last scheduled mid-year assessment (6mo, 18mo, or 30mo after baseline, depending on when parent enrolled in the study)Population: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 who were randomized to the Behavioral Parent Training arm completed this measure. Because the TASCP was added part way through the study, 14 parents in the Behavioral Parent Training arm had already completed all study assessments or were lost to follow-up and did not complete this measure. Parents randomized to the Control arm were not administered this measure because they did not receive the intervention or meet with an interventionist.
The Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Caregivers and Parents measures self-reported strength of perceived therapeutic alliance with their interventionist. Parents rate their level of agreement with 12 statements describing aspects of the therapeutic alliance using Likert-type scales from 1 (Not true) to 4 (Very true). The TASCP score is the mean of these responses with possible scores ranging from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate stronger perceived therapeutic alliance with the interventionist. This measure was added to the study to capture an aspect of satisfaction not included in the Therapy Attitude Inventory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=57 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Caregivers and Parents (TASCP)
|
3.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
—
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Parent's last scheduled mid-year assessment (6mo, 18mo, or 30mo after baseline, depending on when parent enrolled in the study)Population: Parents enrolled in Aim 4 who were randomized to the Behavioral Parent Training arm completed this measure. Because the TASCP was added part way through the study, 14 parents in the Behavioral Parent Training arm had already completed all study assessments or were lost to follow-up and did not complete this measure. Parents randomized to the Control arm were not administered this measure because they did not receive the intervention or meet with an interventionist.
Several aspects of satisfaction with the intervention and interventionist were not captured in originally planned measures. The investigators created 7 items for parents to rate their level of agreement with using Likert-type scales from 1 (Not true) to 4 (Very true). These items are not intended to be a scale but to provide information about specific aspects of satisfaction and experience. The score for each item can range from 1-4. Higher scores indicate higher levels of agreement with each individual statement. These items were added to the study to capture aspects of satisfaction not included in the Therapy Attitude Inventory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=57 Participants
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigator-written Satisfaction Questions
I think my parent coach has the training and experience needed to help me with parenting skills.
|
3.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
—
|
|
Investigator-written Satisfaction Questions
My parent coach explained the purpose of these sessions in a way that made sense to me.
|
3.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
—
|
|
Investigator-written Satisfaction Questions
It was important to me that my parent coach is also the parent of child who's deaf/hard of hearing.
|
3.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
—
|
|
Investigator-written Satisfaction Questions
I could rely on my parent coach to be timely in communicating with me (scheduling, responding, etc.)
|
3.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
—
|
|
Investigator-written Satisfaction Questions
It felt difficult to find the time for these sessions with everything else going on in my life.
|
2.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
—
|
|
Investigator-written Satisfaction Questions
My parent coach offered me appointment times that were convenient for me.
|
3.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
—
|
|
Investigator-written Satisfaction Questions
Technology challenges made the parent coaching sessions difficult.
|
1.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Behavioral Parent Training
Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Behavioral Parent Training
n=71 participants at risk
Parent Training Intervention: Adapted version of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting intervention
|
Control
n=54 participants at risk
No intervention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal Ideation
|
7.0%
5/71 • 36 months
One data instrument, the Beck Depression Inventory II, including a question about suicidal thoughts or wishes. Parent participants completed this questionnaire, and safety protocols were created to immediately alert the research team if a parent endorsed suicidal ideation. Adverse Event data were not collected for Child participants, Aim 2 or Aim 5 participants.
|
5.6%
3/54 • 36 months
One data instrument, the Beck Depression Inventory II, including a question about suicidal thoughts or wishes. Parent participants completed this questionnaire, and safety protocols were created to immediately alert the research team if a parent endorsed suicidal ideation. Adverse Event data were not collected for Child participants, Aim 2 or Aim 5 participants.
|
Additional Information
Dr. Christina Studts
University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place