MedTrace Logo

Peripherally Inserted Versus Centrally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in the Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit

NCT03908866 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2019-04-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aim to compare the cost-effectiveness and safety between centrally and peripherally inserted central venous catheters in neurosurgical intensive care unit patients.

Conditions

  • Thromboses, Venous
  • Infection
  • Economic Problems

Interventions

OTHER

PICC(Peripherally inserted central catheter)

The peripherally inserted central catheter with different sizes (French scale). Trained vascular access nurses will perform the insertion of the PICC, guided by ultrasound at bedside using the Seldinger technique. A suitable sterile field will be established.

OTHER

CVC(Central venous catheter )

The central venous catheter with different sizes (French scale). Trained doctors will perform the insertion of the CVC, using the Seldinger technique. A suitable sterile field will be established.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hao Liu, MD · First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
100 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-04-01
Primary Completion
2019-12-31
Completion
2019-12-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03908866 on ClinicalTrials.gov