Prevention of Surgical Wound Infection

NCT03905213 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 900

Last updated 2019-07-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare cost effectiveness of a polyurethane dressing or a vacuum therapy dressing versus the conventional gauze in the prevention of superficial wound infection y major cardiac surgery

Conditions

  • Cardiac Surgery

Interventions

DEVICE

dressing MEPORE

assignation to three different authorised and on label dressing: conventional dressing (MEPORE)

DEVICE

dressing MEPILEX

assignation to three different authorised and on label dressing: absorbent(MEPILEX)

DEVICE

dressing PICCO

assignation to three different authorised and on label dressing:vacuum Therapy dressing(PICCO)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • Maria Jesus Perez

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Maria Jesus Perez Granda, PhD · Gregorio Marañón Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-09-01
Primary Completion
2021-08-28
Completion
2021-08-28

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03905213 on ClinicalTrials.gov