MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Two Endotracheal Tube Cuff Inflation Methods

NCT03902756 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2020-03-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial, the primary aim of this study to compare the intracuff pressure which is performed by 2 inflation methods. ( study in pediatric patients 4-12 year old) Group1 : Flow -Volume Loop-guided cuff inflation Group2 : Stethoscope-guided cuff inflation Our hypothesis is Flow-Volume Loop-guided cuff pressure will be lower than Stethoscope-guided cuff pressure.

This study also collect the incidence of common post-extubation respiratory adverse events coughing, hoarseness, stridor, croup as an secondary outcomes.

Conditions

  • Endotracheal Cuff Pressure
  • Flow-Volume Loop Guided
  • Stethoscope-guided

Interventions

OTHER

Endotracheal cuff inflation

Endotracheal cuff inflation is putting the air in to the endotracheal tube cuff to make the proper sealing.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ramathibodi Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Witchaya Supaopaspan, medical · Mahidol University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
4 Years
Max Age
12 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-06-05
Primary Completion
2019-05-30
Completion
2019-05-30

Countries

  • Thailand

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03902756 on ClinicalTrials.gov