MedTrace Logo

High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure (NIPPV) in Preterm Infants

NCT03853161 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 130

Last updated 2021-02-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Heated Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula (HHHFNC) versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) in preventing intubation when used as primary respiratory support for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) or post extubation in preterm infants

Conditions

  • Preterm Infant

Interventions

OTHER

Vapotherm

A form of non invasive ventilation used in newborns

OTHER

NIPPV

A form of non invasive ventilation used in newborns

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Carmel Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ayala Gover, MD · Carmel Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-01-21
Primary Completion
2022-01-01
Completion
2023-07-01

Countries

  • Israel

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03853161 on ClinicalTrials.gov