MedTrace Logo

Comparison of FAUCS vs. Misgav Ladach

NCT03812406 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2019-01-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to compare two techniques for performing a cesarean delivery: Misgav Ladach versus French Ambulatory Cesarean Section (FAUCS). The second techniques has been claimed to reduce post-operative pain, the need for analgesics, and reduce the time for ambulation. Such comparison has not been done so far, and this study will examined if indeed the FAUCS techniques offers any advantages.

Conditions

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Ambulation Difficulty

Interventions

PROCEDURE

French Abulatory Cesrean Section

A cesarean section performed according to the FAUCS technique

PROCEDURE

Misgav-Ladach

A cesarean section performed according to the Misgav Ladach technique

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Bnai Zion Medical Center

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-08-19
Primary Completion
2019-08-19
Completion
2019-09-19

Countries

  • Israel

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03812406 on ClinicalTrials.gov