Comparison of Two Techniques of Locoregional Analgesia in Total Knee Prosthesis Surgery : Block to the Adductor Channel Versus Peri-articular Local Infiltrations
NCT03620136 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 98
Last updated 2025-10-03
Summary
The post-operative pain generated by prosthetic knee replacement surgery is known to be moderate to severe during two or three days following surgery.
The most popular analgesic technique after prosthetic knee replacement surgery remains the femoral block (FB), whether in single injection or continuous infusion. In major knee surgery, FBs provide better analgesia compared to systemic morphine and FBs provide the same analgesia that obtained with epidural analgesia but with fewer associated adverse effects.
Although FBs provide excellent post-operative analgesia after total knee prosthesis, they also provide a significant quadricepsia weakness that increases the risk of severe falls and complications, and hinders the rapid rehabilitation process. For these reasons, alternative analgesic techniques have emerged in recent years.
To avoid the quadricipital motor block generated by FBs, some authors proposed the administration of local anesthetics in the adductor channel, also known as the Hunter channel, in order to produce a pure sensory block. With the development of ultrasound, the adductor channel is easily visualized in the middle of the thigh. This allows the adductor channel block (ACB) to be realized with a high success rate. ACB appears to decrease postoperative pain and morphine consumption. It also significantly improves the ability of patients to walk around after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) surgery.
With the same goal of quadricipital savings, the use of the analgesic technique by periarticular infiltration of local anesthetics (ILA) has spread in recent years, due to the fact that an analgesic technique of simple realization and without apparent danger, and this despite limited evidence of its effectiveness.
The Croix-Rousse Hospital is a university hospital in Lyon with a highly developed orthopedic surgery center, producing approximately 550 TKA per year. During the year 2016, approximately half were benefited from post-operative analgesia management by ACB, and the other half by the implementation of the ILA.
To date few studies have been interested in comparing these two analgesic techniques in knee prosthesis surgery.
Conditions
- Analgesic
Interventions
- DRUG
-
locoregional analgesia by a block on the adductor channel
The block at the adductor channel will be realized under echo guidance, before the spinal anesthesia, by puncture at the upper 1/3 of the thigh. It will be used echogenic needle adapted to the morphotype of each patient, of varying length from 50mm to 100mm. A single injection of 20mL of ROPIVACAINE 2mg / ml, the efficacy of which should be checked before spinal anesthesia is performed by a cold test. Knee analgesia will be supplemented by per-operative infiltration of 50mL of ROPIVACAINE 2mg / ml at the posterior capsule, once the surfaces joints prepared to accommodate the prosthesis and by two placebo infiltrations of 50mL each of physiological saline in the medial and lateral ligaments and in the edges of the incision.
- DRUG
-
locoregional analgesia by periarticular local infiltrations
A placebo injection to the adductor channel of 20 mL of physiological serum will be performed in the pre-induction room before surgery, according to the same procedures as the patients of the ACB group. During the surgical procedure, patients in the ILA group will receive a total dose of 300mg of ROPIVACAINE 2mg / ml in the form of 3 periarticular injections. The first injection of 50mL of ROPIVACAINE 2mg / ml will be made once the articular surfaces are prepared to receive the prosthesis, at the level of the posterior capsule. The second injection of 50mL of ROPIVACAINE 2mg / ml will be performed once the total knee prosthesis is installed, in the medial and lateral ligaments. Finally, the last injection will also include 50mL of ROPIVACAINE 2mg / ml and will be made in the edges of the incision at the time of closure.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospices Civils de Lyon
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Caroline Macabeo · Hospices Civils de Lyon
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-02-07
- Primary Completion
- 2019-11-27
- Completion
- 2019-11-28
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Impact of Adductor Canal Block on Functional Recovery
NCT04814303 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block and Adductor Canal Block After Total Knee Replacement Therapy
NCT02125903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Postoperative Pain After Total Knee Replacement.
NCT01163214 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effectiveness of Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01304212 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Treatment of Postoperative Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasy Using Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion
NCT00616850 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Local Analgesia Versus Local Peroperative Infiltration After Total Hip Replacement
NCT02720471 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Adductor Canal Block With Posterior Capsular Injection for Total Knee Replacement
NCT01805661 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Capsular Injection With Femoral Nerve Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02701296 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block With Repeated Bolus Doses Arthroplasty
NCT03188809 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
BLOCK-study: Better Local Orthopedic Pain Control After Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06746168 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Regional Anesthesia Techniques After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03143738 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adductor Canal Block and Multimodal Local Infiltration Analgesia in Patients Receiving Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05439343 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Continuous Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty Analgesia
NCT02387021 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Optimizing Pain and Rehabilitation After Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01616836 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Blocks With Intrathecal Morphine in Improving Analgesia After Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02135120 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Combined With Periarticular Multimodal Drug Injection (PMDI) Versus Isolated PMDI for Pain Management After Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT05320913 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Infiltration or Nerve Blocks in Addition to Adductor Canal Block
NCT06920186 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Selective Tibial Nerve Block vs Local Infiltration Analgesia After Prothetic Knee Surgery
NCT03698006 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
How Does the Addition of Adductor Canal Block to Local Infiltration Affect Recovery in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Feasibility Study.
NCT04648072 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Bupivacaine Liposomes or Bupivacaine for Femoral Triangle or Adductor Block on Analgesia After Total Knee Replacement
NCT06653621 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Total Knee Arthroplasty Analgesia: Single-shot Femoral Nerve Block or Epidural?
NCT02164825 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Postoperative Functional Recovery and Analgesic Efficacy of a Single Shot Sciatic Nerve Block Versus Posterior Capsule/Fat Pad Infiltration of Local Anesthetic for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT00677261 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PENG Block Combined to Wound Infiltration for Hip Replacement
NCT04306133 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Analgesia in Bilateral Knee Arthroplasties
NCT06357013 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Single Shot vs 24hr vs 48hr Continuous Adductor Canal Block After TKA
NCT02730728 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA