Randomized Control Trial of Booster Seat Education Material to Increase Perceived Benefit Among Parents
NCT03573830 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 731
Last updated 2020-11-24
Summary
Seat belts protect people from injuries by diverting crash forces to stronger anatomical structures: the rib cage and the pelvis. Children between the ages of 4 and 8 years are typically not tall enough to wear the seat belt correctly across the chest and hips, and instead wear it on their abdomen and neck. When worn in this way, seat belts direct crash forces to these parts of the body, potentially causing serious damage to internal organs and the spine. For this reason, children of these ages need to use a booster seat; a safety device that prevents seat belt related injuries by raising the child and ensuring the straps are correctly worn across the thorax and hips. In Canada, half of the children who should be using booster seats are prematurely restrained using only the seat belt. The present research project seeks to develop and test a novel intervention to encourage booster seat use.
Many Canadian provinces have enacted laws mandating use, and have developed and implemented evidence-based education programs. Despite these efforts, new approaches to encourage booster seat use are required. In 2010, more than 10 years after booster seats became mandatory, the rate of utilization in the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec was still low (25%). Furthermore, recent research indicates that parents' perception of the safety benefit of booster seats is the strongest predictor of use, yet no study to date has tested an education intervention that increases perceived benefit; instead, these interventions focus on teaching guidelines (i.e., minimum and maximum age, height, and weight to determine when a child should use a booster seat, and when it is safe for a child to use only the seat belt).
The present approach to encouraging booster seat use is novel, because it increases perceived benefit by teaching two principles: (1) seat belts prevent injuries by redirecting crash forces to stronger parts of the body (rib cage and pelvis); and (2), without booster seats, children would wear the seat belt on their abdomen and neck, which directs crash forces to more vulnerable anatomical structures (internal organs and spine). Once parents grasp these two principles, they are expected to better appreciate the safety benefit of booster seats and, thus, be more likely to use them.
Conditions
- Wounds and Injuries
Interventions
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Transport Canada material
The current Transport Canada booster seat education material focuses on imparting guidelines; that is, it describes, in plain language, the minimum and maximum ages, heights, and weights to determine when a child should use a booster seat, and when it is safe for a child to use only the seat belt. This material does not describe the principle of operation of seat belts (i.e., redirecting crash forces to the rib cage and pelvis), nor the principle of operation of booster seats (i.e., ensuring the seat belt is placed correctly across the chest and hips).
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Enhanced material
Enhancements to the booster seat education material were developed based on the hypothesis that parents would better appreciate the additional injury risk reduction afforded by booster seats, if they understand that: (1) seat belts prevent injuries by redirecting crash forces to stronger parts of the body (i.e., rib cage and pelvis); and (2), without booster seats, children would wear the seat belt on their abdomen and neck, which directs crash forces to more vulnerable anatomical structures (i.e., internal organs and spine).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Child and Family Research Institute
collaborator OTHER -
University of British Columbia
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mariana Brussoni, PhD · University of British Columbia, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-12-10
- Primary Completion
- 2018-12-28
- Completion
- 2018-12-28
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Feasibility of Pertussis Immunization in a Canadian Emergency Department
NCT03304275 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Satisfaction Rates Among Parents of Children With Autism in the ED
NCT02675933 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
DVD-Based Training Program in Self-Hypnosis for Children
NCT01483105 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Painful Procedures in the Emergency Department: A Distraction Intervention
NCT00338364 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Parent Resource About Pediatric Clinical Trials
NCT07233967 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reducing Immunization Distress (RID)
NCT01379885 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Sustainability of a Knowledge Translation Intervention to Improve Paediatric Pain
NCT02236949 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of a Pediatric Trauma Checklist to Improve Clinical Performance in a Simulated Trauma Resuscitation
NCT03234049 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Impact of a Patient Education Tool for Appendicitis
NCT05571566 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of a Pain Assessment and Management Program for Respite Workers Supporting Children With Disabilities
NCT03421795 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Painful Procedures in the Emergency Department: A Distraction Intervention (3-5 Year Olds)
NCT00337870 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Sustainable Solutions for Paediatric Basic Life Support Training in Day Care Centres
NCT03469154 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for Children; A Prospective Multi-Center Evaluation.
NCT00807352 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
How Does Task Loading in PICU Impact on Clinician Situational Awareness and Awareness of the Passage of Time?
NCT05383222 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Video Education: Capitalizing on Caregiver Time Spent in the Pediatric Emergency Department Waiting Room
NCT02242682 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Examining the Effect of a Scripted Debriefing on Resuscitation Performance in Pediatrics
NCT01682629 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Testing Educational Materials in a Paediatric Setting
NCT01713322 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Parental Presence During Fracture Reduction in Children at the Emergency Department; A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT00809380 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Helping Children's Centres to Enhance Home Safety
NCT01452191 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Intensivists and Primary Nurses to Decrease Pediatric ICU Length of Stay
NCT03364933 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Improving Performance in Pediatric Trauma by Teaching Nontechnical Skills
NCT05910515 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Safety Skills Training: Parents of School-Aged Children
NCT02329340 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Testing and Development of a Sleep Training Mobile Health Application
NCT02718196 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Improving Parental Soothing by Video
NCT01826383 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Online Training Tools in Pediatric Resuscitation
NCT03640520 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA