Subjective and Objective Results With CI Electrode Types

NCT03515473 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 139

Last updated 2018-05-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Background The authors' aim was to compare the influence of various electrode designs on selected objective and subjective clinical outcomes for cochlear implant recipients using the same model of receiver-stimulator, Cochlear™ Nucleus® Profile Series and sound processor.

Methods A multicenter study with subjects with profound sensorineural hearing loss, who were implanted and followed up in two tertiary centers. A total of 54 ears were implanted with Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI532, 51 with Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI522 and 54 with the Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI512. Implant loss and intraoperative electrophysiological tests (electrically evoked stapedial reflex threshold \[ESRT\], neural response telemetry threshold \[T-NRT\] and impedance), postoperative data (C-level, T-level, dynamic range, T-NRT and power consumption) and intracochlear position of the active electrode were analyzed with Nucleus Custom Sound 4.4 software.

Conditions

  • Cochlear Implant

Interventions

DEVICE

cochlear implant

cochlear implant surgery

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Szeged University

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-11-13
Primary Completion
2017-06-04
Completion
2017-11-30
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Hungary

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03515473 on ClinicalTrials.gov