COMparison of Portable Fingertip Versus Conventional Pulse OximeteRs Trial

NCT03496493 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 220

Last updated 2019-02-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Perioperative non-invasive measurement of a patient's peripheral arterial oxygen saturation has become an accepted standard of care endorsed by anaesthesiologists and their regulatory bodies throughout the world. Pulse oximeters are an integral item on the World Health Organisation's Surgical Safety Checklist which is performed prior to the commencement of every surgical procedure. They are also utilised by other medical professionals and patients in various scenarios. When compared to conventional bedside pulse oximeters, portable fingertip devices have the advantages of cost-effectiveness, high portability, ease of use and battery operation. A review of recent literature reveals a paucity of accuracy studies in adult patients with various comorbidities in the clinical setting. Most data has been obtained under ideal laboratory conditions utilizing healthy adult volunteers. This study aims to pragmatically investigate the performance of a portable fingertip pulse oximeter in adult patients in a hospital setting.

Conditions

  • Anesthesia
  • Hypoxemia

Interventions

DEVICE

All patients

Peripheral arterial oxygen saturation recording with both study devices

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Cape Town

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ross Hofmeyr, FCA(SA) · University of Cape Town

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-04-15
Primary Completion
2018-06-11
Completion
2018-12-31
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • South Africa

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03496493 on ClinicalTrials.gov