MedTrace Logo

Comparisons of Two Types of Armeo Robot for Upper Extremities

NCT03465267 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2018-03-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Comparison of two types of robot (Armeo power vs Armeo spring) for upper extremity rehabilitation on upper extremity function

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Armeo power

Intervention with Armeo power rehabilitation robot for upper extremity (made by Hocoma), which provide assistive force. The intervention was done 4 weeks, 5 times/week, 30 minutes/day.

DEVICE

Armeo spring

Intervention with Armeo spring rehabilitation robot for upper extremity (made by Hocoma), which is operated only by participants, without any assistive force from robot. The intervention was done 4 weeks, 5 times/week, 30 minutes/day.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Joon-Ho Shin, MS · National Rehabilitation Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-06-01
Primary Completion
2018-12-31
Completion
2018-12-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03465267 on ClinicalTrials.gov