Three M Study (Malabsorption, Microbiota, Mini-Gastric Bypass)
NCT03412149 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90
Last updated 2021-04-28
Summary
Bariatric surgery represents the best therapeutic option to induce sustainable weight loss and to solve serious comorbidities improving the life-expectancy and the quality of life. Actually the choice of the procedure is based on the surgeon's and patients preference . Mini gastric bypass(MGB) is an emerging procedure offering excellent results in terms of weight loss and comorbidities (mainly metabolic) control. On the other hand, recent data indicated that the gut microbiota may mediate some of the beneficial effects of bariatric surgery and changes in the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota have been observed after RY Gastric Bypass (RYGB) in humans as well as in mice. However, there are no prospective investigations on Gut Microbiota changes after MGB, despite the procedure is described as "malabsorptive" and there are no studies comparing gut microbiota shift and malabsorption entity in humans after RYGB vs MGB. Thereafter prospective data on the incidence of bile reflux esophageal lesions after MGB are lacking.
The aim of the present multicentric prospective comparative study is to evaluate malabsorption and gut microbiota shift after laparoscopic RYGB vs MGB at 1 year.
Conditions
- Obesity (Disorder)
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Mini Gastric Bypass
Standardization of the techniques will be guaranteed: 1. Mini Gastric Bypass Arm 2. Roux en Y Gastric Bypass arm All patients will have intraoperative measurement of the whole length of bowel from Treitz ligament to the ileocecal junction (expected range 6-8 m).The common limb will be therefore about 2/3 of total small bowel length.
- PROCEDURE
-
Roux en Y Gastric Bypass
Standardization of the techniques will be guaranteed: 1. Mini Gastric Bypass Arm 2. Roux en Y Gastric Bypass arm All patients will have intraoperative measurement of the whole length of bowel from Treitz ligament to the ileocecal junction (expected range 6-8 m).The common limb will be therefore about 2/3 of total small bowel length.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Roma La Sapienza
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Gianfranco Silecchia, MD PhD · University of Roma La Sapienza
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- BASIC_SCIENCE
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-03-21
- Primary Completion
- 2020-02-19
- Completion
- 2020-11-19
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Omega Loop Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT02139813 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Follow up After SG vs RYGB vs OAGB
NCT03467646 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini-Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en Y Gastric Bypass
NCT03045679 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between Short vs. Long Biliopancreatic Limb Gastric Bypass
NCT04609449 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Roux En-y Gastric Bypass
NCT05746936 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Banded-versus-Standard Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT01504685 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT05145205 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-Y-gastric Bypass in the Treatment of Morbid Obesity
NCT00356213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrospective Comparison of Lap and Robotic-Assisted RYGB and SG
NCT04329780 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Trends and Safety in Revisional Bariatric Surgery in Italy
NCT05194943 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Sleeve Gastrectomy With Transit Bipartition(SG+TB) Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) for Type 3 Obesity
NCT04915014 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Clinical Trial
NCT04649619 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Longitudinal Cohort Study Comparing 2 Surgical Techniques in Patients With Class 3 Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00688974 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
5 and 7-year Follow-up of the YOMEGA Trial Cohort
NCT05549271 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT04354532 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery
NCT01754194 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Assessment of Nutritional Status After Gastric Bypass Surgery
NCT01891591 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Versus Omega-Loop Gastric Bypass (OLGB) Safety and Efficacy Short-term Study
NCT02290418 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Biliopancreatic Diversion (BPD)- Duodenal Switch for Superobesity
NCT00327912 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Conversion to SADI-S, RYGB or OAGB After Failed Sleeve
NCT05608772 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Interventional Study to Evaluate the Role of LRYGBP, LSG & SMM
NCT04058730 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT02475590 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Diabetes Remission and Hypoabsorptive Bariatric Surgery
NCT06043245 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Gastric Procedures for Obesity
NCT01026181 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Sleeve Gastrectomy as a Standard Bariatric Procedure
NCT05336331 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING